[upbeat music]
Wesley Phoa, Solutions portfolio manager at Capital Group
Wesley: The investment landscape keeps changing, and it’s important to evolve with it to help your clients pursue their objectives over the long term.
When we think about constructing a modern diversified portfolio, we take a holistic approach that allows broader access to the investment universe.
Victoria Quach, Senior client analytics manager at Capital Group
Victoria: That’s right, Wesley. Asset classes like private credit and private equity, once viewed as “alternatives,” have matured and evolved. They’re now more accessible to more investors, as semi-liquid solutions, offering blends of public and private markets.
That increase in accessibility has prompted financial professionals to consider semi-liquid allocations in more of their clients’ portfolios. But for those who are newer to private markets investing, it can be difficult to know how to start.
So, even for investors who currently have exposure to private asset classes, these new semi-liquid solutions could be an interesting opportunity to augment their core portfolios. So, let’s discuss a few ways to incorporate semi-liquid holdings and provide some strategies for different types of allocations.
- Sounds great.
[upbeat music]
- Before allocating to private investments, it’s important to understand if your firm has guidance on how much you might invest in certain asset classes or funds.
Wesley, how would you and the Capital Solutions Group consider this type of guidance?
- Many firms have a limit of, for example, 15% in a single fund, and limits on total allocations to private markets. These two guidance limits align with one of our principles in building portfolios, which is having fund diversification and having diversified exposures. When we think through how to allocate, we can consider this guidance and still find opportunities to pursue various portfolio goals.
- Now let’s discuss some sample personas and potential allocations. In each case, we’ll consider the potential trade-offs for exchanging some liquidity for the potential of greater returns, diversification and expanded opportunities. For each investor profile, we’ll highlight key characteristics that influence the asset class decision, including risk capacity, time horizon and liquidity needs.
Let’s dive in.
Imagine a growth-oriented investor at the start of their career. They have a long time horizon and a strong risk appetite and are more comfortable with significant market volatility and limited liquidity in pursuit of maximum capital appreciation. Wesley, what might a portfolio for that person look like?
- In the past, an individual like that might have a 100% allocation to public equities, trying to pursue maximum growth potential. By taking 15% of that portfolio and allocating it to semi-liquid equity strategies, we believe the portfolio could have enhanced return potential without trading away too much in liquidity. Capital Group KKR U.S. Equity+ combines public and private equities into one integrated solution and is worth considering for that allocation.
- What about a more conservative investor? Perhaps someone who is already retired, more interested in capital stability and steady income than growth potential. Given their medium risk, illiquidity capacity and shorter time horizon, any ideas for them?
- Absolutely. Someone in that stage might be more sensitive to liquidity risks and market volatility. They’d probably have a modest equity allocation, maybe of around 20%. For that individual, semi-liquid equity might not be the best fit. Semi-liquid fixed income, however, might be compelling. Our Public-Private+ Solutions suite currently includes two semi-liquid fixed income funds.
- Capital Group KKR Core Plus+ and Capital Group KKR Multi-Sector+.
- That’s right. Taking that 80% fixed income allocation and putting 10% of it to work in Core Plus+ may provide benefits in the form of enhanced diversification and income potential.
- Ok, now what about someone in the middle? A mid-career investor seeking to build long-term wealth while generating stable income. Someone with some appetite for risk, but who wants downside protection. Might it make sense to include semi-liquid equity and semi-liquid fixed income?
- Absolutely. We view private credit and private equity, and especially our suite of Public-Private+ Solutions, as extensions of traditional allocations. We’ve done research to suggest that many investors may be able to tolerate more illiquidity in their portfolios than they might think. But even modest allocations to these solutions could provide higher potential returns. This combination of public and private, equities and fixed income, is what we mean be a “Modern diversified portfolio.”
- So, in this case, let’s imagine a 65/35 split of stocks and bonds, a fairly common portfolio mix. Where would public-private solutions fit into each sleeve of that?
- On the equities side, you might consider doing 56% public equity and 9% semi-liquid. For fixed income, 30% to public fixed income would leave you with 5% for semi-liquid products.
- If an advisor wanted to use our funds, that would be Capital Group KKR U.S. Equity+ and Capital Group KKR Multi-Sector+. These are a lot of interesting opportunities to consider.
- Portfolio construction is an interesting field! Every investor has their own objectives and risk tolerances, so, no two clients can be handled the exact same way.
- That’s right. Financial professionals should take care to ensure that the portfolios they’re building are appropriate for a given client. Thoughtful due diligence is essential.
- And an understanding of what your options are is a critical part of due diligence. Thanks for watching.
[upbeat music]