June 18, 2026
A conservative approach to international equities
- The fund seeks prudent capital growth and conservation of principal by investing primarily in companies based in developed markets.
- CGIE aims for a smoother return profile across full market cycles with lower volatility by focusing on companies with long-term growth potential and downside resilience attributes.
- Historically, CGIE has exhibited lower standard deviation and beta than the MSCI EAFE® (Europe, Australasia, Far East) Index, indicating reduced volatility and smaller fluctuations around its average return.
CGIE volatility metrics since inception
Source: Morningstar. Data from fund inception date of 9/26/23 to 3/31/26.
Quality focus
- The fund takes a prudent approach to international investing, limiting emerging markets (EM) exposure to no more than 10% of net assets.
- Factor analysis suggests the ETF has consistently delivered greater exposure to the quality factor relative to the MSCI EAFE Index, reflecting differentiated holdings relative to the index.
- Quality factor exposure measures a portfolio’s tilt toward companies with strong fundamentals — such as high profitability, stable earnings, and low leverage — compared to the broader market.
Quality factor exposure
Source: Morningstar. Data from fund inception date of 9/26/23 to 3/31/26. This exhibit illustrates historical exposure to quality factor as defined and calculated by Morningstar, representing the amount of standard deviations that each factor exposure is away from the mean. Morningstar defines a quality firm as one with high profitability and low financial leverage. High scores imply high quality firms. A score of 0 can be interpreted as an average score with a nonzero score being interpreted as the amount of standard deviations from the mean. A quality score of a stock is the equally weighted score of the a company’s profitability (trailing 12-month return on asset) and the score of its financial leverage (trailing 12-month debt/invested capital. The factor is unbounded and higher scores indicate higher quality.
Dynamic positioning
- CGIE’s sector exposures are driven by bottom‑up security selection, not top‑down sector views or index weights.
- As research conviction in individual holdings evolves, sector allocations naturally expand or contract based on where growth opportunities may emerge.
- This approach can lead to dynamic sector positioning over time, rather than static alignment with benchmark sector weights.
Sector exposures (%)
Source: Capital Group based on data from FactSet. Data from fund inception date of 9/26/23 to 3/31/26.
Access to global leaders beyond U.S. markets
- CGIE’s underlying managers look beyond the U.S. for a broad range of opportunities as global leaders have often been found in international markets.
- While leadership has been concentrated within the U.S. in a historic way, new opportunities are emerging in markets outside the United States.
- These opportunities include areas like artificial intelligence (AI), where the fund seeks to participate through the broader AI ecosystem, including semiconductor manufacturers, as well as utilities and electrification.
Market leadership by decade
Sources: Capital Group, MSCI, RIMES. Largest companies are based on market capitalization in USD. All returns are annualized 10-year total returns in USD, starting on the observation date. Observation date for each set of holdings is December 31 of the year.
For example, for 1980, the observation date for the largest companies is December 31, 1980. The exception is for 2000, which uses the observation date of February 28, 2000, as it reflects the closest month-end peak of the tech bubble. Next 10 years refers to the average annual total return of the stock or index from the current decade’s beginning observation date to the beginning of the next decade. As of 12/31/25.
A differentiated approach
- Using a bottom‑up approach, CGIE maintains sector exposures that differ from the MSCI EAFE Index.
- The fund is overweight industrials, information technology and utilities, while underweight financials, healthcare and consumer staples.
- This approach is designed to support the objective of prudent capital growth and principal preservation.
Source: Capital Group. As of 3/31/26. Numbers are rounded.