March 26, 2026
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Pure growth strategies can increase valuation and concentration risk.
- A flexible, research‑driven approach can adapt to changing markets.
- CGGR seeks to deliver this flexibility through deep fundamental research and multiple independent portfolio managers working across a broad opportunity set, subject to fund guidelines, without the constraints of rigid style definitions.
1. Flexible approach to growth
- CGGR is principally focused on U.S.-based companies but can also invest selectively in global leaders with a meaningful U.S. presence.
- This approach has produced a differentiated growth fund that has delivered strong returns without the concentration risk and rigidity of passive approaches.
- The fund’s flexible approach allows managers to invest across different types of growth opportunities including cyclicals and turnarounds.
2. Dynamic positioning
- CGGR’s sector positioning is an outcome of bottom-up security selection, not top-down sector calls or benchmark weights.
- As individual holdings gain or lose conviction, sector exposures naturally expand or contract, reflecting where research is uncovering growth opportunities.
- This results in dynamic sector positioning over time, rather than static alignment with index sector weights.
Range of relative sector exposure vs. S&P 500 Index (%)
Sources: Capital Group, based on data from FactSet; S&P Dow Jones Indices. Data from fund inception date of 2/22/22 to 12/31/25.
3. Diversified, not concentrated
- CGGR seeks to avoid the single sector and megacap concentration that has increasingly defined style-based growth benchmarks and passive funds that track them.
- This diversification spreads risk across the portfolio, reducing exposure to a narrow list of stocks.
- As a result, returns have been driven by multiple contributors, rather than relying on one or two dominant megacap stocks.
Weight in top 5 holdings (%)
Source: Capital Group. As of 12/31/25.
4. Seeking growth, but not at any cost
- CGGR invests in companies with higher growth potential than the S&P 500 Index, based on estimated earnings per share growth, but at meaningfully lower valuations than the Russell 1000 Growth Index based on price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio.
- These conditions suggest a tradeoff for investors — paying less for earnings than in the Russell 1000 Growth with potentially better growth than the S&P 500.
- Growth is pursued with valuation awareness — not index indifference.
Valuation metrics
Source: FactSet. As of 12/31/25.
5. A differentiated approach
- Using a bottom-up approach, CGGR has differentiated sector exposures compared to the S&P 500 and the Russell 1000 Growth indexes.
- The fund has been significantly underweight technology relative to the Russell 1000 Growth (nearly one-half of the sector allocation) and underweight relative to the S&P 500.
- This positioning is designed to deliver diversification from extreme market concentration, while breaking from conventional growth allocations.
Source: Capital Group, FactSet. As of 12/31/25. Numbers are rounded.
Maria Karahalis is an equity investment director and portfolio strategy manager with 39 years of experience (as of 12/31/25). She holds a master’s degree in management from MIT Sloan School of Management and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Wellesley College.
Brad Olalde is an senior investment product manager with 13 years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2025). He holds a bachelor's degree in finance and international business from Villanova University.