Market downturns can be devastating to target date fund participants in the years surrounding the retirement date when participants need to preserve wealth. Identifying a target date fund that has provided solid results with low volatility could help cushion investors from inopportune downturns. But keep in mind, although target date portfolios are managed on a projected retirement time frame, the allocation strategy does not guarantee that investors' retirement goals will be met.
The following two hypothetical target date series have similar risk levels across vintages (as measured by standard deviation), but series A had a significantly higher annual return at each level of risk taken.
How has the series balanced risk and return?
Returns per standard deviation for two hypothetical target date series:
Hypothetical results are for illustrative purposes only and in no way represent the actual results of a specific investment. Standard deviation is a measure of how returns over time have varied from the mean and is one of the most common measures of absolute volatility. A lower number signifies lower volatility.
A more specific sense of how a target date series has held up against its peers in both up and down markets can come from a fund’s upside and downside capture ratios.
Upside and downside capture ratios measure how well a fund did relative to a passive index (like the S&P 500) when markets rose or fell. An upside capture of >1.0 indicates the fund captured more of the upside than the index, while a downside capture of <1.0 indicates less decline.
There is a metric we believe reveals how well a series has managed that trade-off: the overall capture ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing a fund’s upside capture by its downside capture.
The unsung metric: Overall capture
A higher ratio means that a fund’s upside has tended to exceed its downside.
This example is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only.
The glide path is what sets the target date apart as an investment vehicle — and what drives its simplicity for participants. It is also one of the more challenging things to evaluate when selecting a series.
To or through?
There are two types of glide paths: a “to” glide path, where the fund reaches its most conservative allocation at the target date, and a “through” glide path, where the fund's allocation continues to adjust to a more conservative allocation for a period of up to 30 years after the target date. A "to" series generally reflects an approach designed for the period leading up to retirement, based on the assumption that participants may invest in the fund up until the target date and may transition their assets out of the plan at or around retirement. However, we believe that as plans increasingly support participants staying in the plan beyond retirement, plans should consider how a ‘through’ series fits within that environment, particularly given that these series tend to align with participants who plan to remain invested post-retirement and withdraw assets over time.
What types of equity?
How much equity a target date series has near the retirement date matters for participants because equity exposure often is the biggest source of volatility in a glide path. But the types of equities matter, too, as not all equities are equally volatile. Does the series shift to historically less volatile equities as investors age? How much of the equity near retirement is in less volatile vs. more volatile types of securities and/or markets? For example, is the equity near retirement growth-oriented, or is it more focused on defensive, dividend-paying equities that have tended to do better when markets decline?
Not all equities are equal
Dividend-paying stocks may reduce volatility when participants are more vulnerable.
Expenses clearly matter as they directly reduce the returns participants receive. End results (which factor in fees) matter more, however, as that’s what determines participant outcomes. To weigh both cost and potential return, plot target date funds’ expense ratios against their annualized returns so you can incorporate both value and cost into the selection process.
When choosing a target date series, the quality of portfolio managers is arguably the most critical consideration.
Here are some areas we think merit a close look:
Experience — How long have target date managers been in the industry? What are their professional backgrounds? Do they bring a mix of equity, fixed income and multi-asset experience?
Personal ownership — Are the series’ managers personally invested in their target date series? High manager ownership is a sign of managers’ conviction, as it means they share in participants’ investment gains and losses. This information is typically published by Morningstar and in a fund’s SEC-required Statement of Additional Information (SAI), which typically is available on an asset manager’s website.