Putting technology stocks’ volatility in perspective | Capital Group Canada | Insights

Insights

ARTICLES  |  NOVEMBER 2018

Putting technology stocks’ volatility in perspective

Featuring
Chris Buchbinder, Portfolio manager
Mark Casey, Portfolio manager
Don O’Neal, Portfolio manager

Technology stocks have declined sharply in the recent market downturn, but many tech heavyweights continue to present solid, long-term investment opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • Technology stocks could remain volatile for some time amid the potential for slower earnings growth at some companies and greater regulatory scrutiny.
  • There will likely be a dispersion of returns among the FAANG stocks, given different valuations and where they are in the earnings cycle.
  • The long-term outlook for many technology companies remains positive, supported by strong business models, dominant industry positioning and potential new areas of growth.


Technology and tech-related stocks have led markets on the way up and the way down in recent weeks. Volatility in technology shares remains higher than the broader market. The FAANG (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google owner Alphabet) stocks in particular have come under pressure, given their strong bull run. Are they getting de-fanged or will they be able to hold their ground?

Although we may see a period of weakness and continued volatility in some technology stocks, the fundamentals of many of these heavyweights remain solid. Capital Group portfolio manager Don O’Neal says, “We are always on the lookout for massive disruptions in business models. That does not appear to be the case in the near term for these dominant companies.”

Here are four factors that managers believe will continue to characterize the technology space.

1. Expect continued tech sector volatility

During the three periods of pronounced volatility in U.S. equity markets this year — in January, March and October — technology stocks fell harder than the overall market each time. But they also rebounded stronger than the broader market in subsequent periods. Despite the volatility, the technology sector has still delivered the highest returns year to date, gaining 11% through October 31, while the S&P 500 rose 3%. Two technology-related companies – Amazon and Netflix – have also had outsized gains, with year-to-date returns of 37% and 57%, respectively.

“In the early days of a market correction, stocks that have done the best in the recent period often come down the most. But over a long-term horizon, the outlook for these companies can continue to be strong,” O’Neal says.

chart-tech-volatility-916x479

2. Amazon is a case study in investing through market volatility


Sharp market declines are nothing new for many high-flying tech stocks. As an example, since the financial crisis of 2008, Amazon shares have declined at least 15% on 10 different occasions, and more than 30% in three different periods. But following each of the previous corrections, its shares hit new highs. Investors who could stomach short-term volatility saw big gains, whereas those who sold the stock in one of those declines missed out.

The recent slide in Amazon‘s share price has been steep. Weakness in the retail sector caught up with the company and overshadowed its progress in profitability across the entire business. Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company’s cloud computing unit, also slowed slightly, with revenues growing 46% in the third quarter, down from a 49% growth rate in the second quarter.

“In absolute terms, AWS’s growth rate is still very strong and it remains a growth engine for the company, accounting for more than 50% of its operating profit,” says technology analyst. “While the share price may experience some weakness in the near term, Amazon has the ability, in my view, to remain one of the strongest large companies in the world.”

chart-amazon-volatility-916x479

3. Tech stock fundamentals continue to be strong


During the late 1990s tech boom that peaked in early 2000, share prices of web companies outran their earnings potential, stretching valuations to unsustainable levels. This is not the case today. While some companies, including Facebook and Amazon, have struck a note of caution in recent earnings guidance, in aggregate, profits for technology companies are more in sync with their share prices. Moreover, cash balances at Apple, Microsoft and Alphabet are among the largest at any nonfinancial U.S. company.

Dominant tech companies today share many characteristics that have accelerated their growth and warded off competitors. “Two things I look for most in these companies are a wide moat and a long runway. Think Amazon in retail. Google in search. Facebook in social media. Microsoft in office productivity software. Apple in premium phones and tablets,” says Capital Group portfolio manager Mark Casey.

Other factors that favour many of these companies are:

1.

Multiple peripheral businesses that could become much larger over time, such as YouTube and Android for Google, and Instagram and WhatsApp for Facebook

2.

Lots of cash on balance sheets

3.

Strong founder CEOs still at the helm

4.

Above-average organic revenue growth

5.

The ability to attract the best talent in the industry

chart-tech-profits-mkt-cap-916x450

Yet, although they share many common traits, “The FAANG stocks are not a homogenous group,” says Chris Buchbinder a portfolio manager for Capital Group U.S. Equity FundSM (Canada). “For example, in the case of Facebook, recent weakness in the stock has been driven by regulatory concerns and company guidance with respect to both near and longer term cost pressures. At current levels, a lot of that may already be factored into the price.”

Buchbinder adds, “On the other hand, a lot of optimism about the future has been factored in the stock prices of Amazon and Netflix. I remain very positive on these companies, but do things have to be even better than the market expects for the stocks to continue to do as well as they have? Probably. I think we will see greater dispersion of returns among the FAANG stocks.”

4. Valuations are reasonable for many tech companies


Another big difference from the dot-com period is that, as a group, these stocks don’t all trade at nosebleed valuations. Facebook and Apple trade at forward P/E ratios in the teens. Microsoft and Alphabet are priced at less than 23x consensus forward earnings. Although those valuations are richer than the broader market, it is easier to make a case that these companies can grow into those multiples. Amazon’s price-to-earnings multiple is among the highest in the group, but the company’s huge investments in the business result in more modest reported earnings.

chart-fang-foward-pe-916x450

O’Neal believes current valuation levels are reasonable, considering these companies’ higher growth potential. “In the internet bubble, that group of high-flying stocks went to extreme valuations that we had never seen before without the earnings to back them up. But now, the current crop of big technology stocks sells at premiums that are quite modest relative to the broader market. The valuations are reasonable considering the strong fundamentals and growth prospects of these companies over the next few years.

“As an example only, Facebook trades at around 20 times next year’s earnings, which is similar to other consumer-oriented stocks such as Clorox and Procter & Gamble. Which one would you rather invest in, assuming similar price-to-earnings multiples – a company growing at 0%–5% or 20%–25%?” O’Neal says.

“Over the medium to longer term, regulation could disrupt their business models. It will be a risk that could be with us through the next presidential election cycle. That said, I believe many of these companies will be able to manage their businesses despite greater regulation and scrutiny,” he adds.



About


Chris Buchbinder
Portfolio manager

Chris has 22 years of investment experience, all with Capital Group. He holds bachelor's degrees in economics and international relations from Brown University. He is based in San Francisco.


Mark Casey
Portfolio manager

Mark has 16 years of investment experience, all with Capital. Based in San Francisco, he covers U.S. internet and document imaging companies. He holds an MBA from Harvard Business School.


Don O’Neal
Portfolio manager

Don has 31 years of investment experience, all with Capital Group. As an investment analyst he covered chemical, aerospace and defense, and environmental companies. Don holds an MBA from Stanford.

 

 

 


Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

Unless otherwise indicated, the investment professionals featured do not manage Capital Group‘s Canadian mutual funds.

References to particular companies or securities, if any, are included for informational or illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as an endorsement by Capital Group. Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any investment funds or current holdings of any investment funds. These views should not be considered as investment advice nor should they be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and not be comprehensive or to provide advice. For informational purposes only; not intended to provide tax, legal or financial advice. We assume no liability for any inaccurate, delayed or incomplete information, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. The information contained herein has been supplied without verification by us and may be subject to change. Capital Group funds are available in Canada through registered dealers. For more information, please consult your financial and tax advisors for your individual situation.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual events and results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made herein. We encourage you to consider these and other factors carefully before making any investment decisions and we urge you to avoid placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The S&P 500 is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2018 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

Bloomberg® is a trademark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. (collectively with its affiliates, "Bloomberg"). Barclays® is a trademark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, "Barclays"), used under licence. Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

MSCI does not approve, review or produce reports published on this site, makes no express or implied warranties or representations and is not liable whatsoever for any data represented. You may not redistribute MSCI data or use it as a basis for other indices or investment products.

Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.

Capital Group funds and Capital International Asset Management (Canada), Inc. are part of Capital Group, a global investment management firm originating in Los Angeles, California in 1931. The Capital Group companies manage equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.

The Capital Group funds offered on this website are available only to Canadian residents.


Related Insights