Participant Education
For the past two decades, plan sponsors of corporate defined contribution (DC) plans focused on helping employees participate and save for retirement. Today's challenge is more complex.
Participants are accumulating larger balances, retiring with greater responsibility for their own financial outcomes and looking to workplace plans for guidance beyond enrollment and through retirement.
As a result, plan sponsors are focused on three questions: Are participants saving enough? Are they invested appropriately? And can we help participants turn accumulated assets into sustainable retirement income?
In Capital Group’s 2026 Institutional Retirement Survey of Plan Sponsors, we found that sponsors are making progress across all three fronts. Here are some key findings.
One of the clearest findings from the survey is that automatic plan features continue to gain momentum. Today, 83% of plan sponsors report using automatic enrollment, up from 71% in our 2023 survey. Similarly, 56% of sponsors now use automatic escalation, compared with 37% previously.
Automatic enrollment helps participants begin saving earlier, while automatic escalation steadily increases contribution rates over time. Together, these features address one of the most persistent challenges in retirement planning: insufficient savings. On average, most plan sponsors we polled said their participants contribute 6% to 9% of their salary each year to their DC plan.
In terms of auto-enrollment, many sponsors set the default contribution rate between 3% and 6% of salary, reflecting different plan philosophies and workforce needs.
Most participants contribute between 6% and 9% of salary
Source: Capital Group’s 2026 Institutional Retirement Survey of Plan Sponsors. As of May 2026.
For plan sponsors, we’d suggest reviewing whether current defaults are producing the desired retirement-readiness outcomes. Sponsors that offer automatic enrollment may want to revisit default contribution rates and escalation schedules to help participants make more effective use of employer matching contributions.
Here’s an important insight from the survey: 80% of plan sponsors have never conducted an investment re-enrollment. Yet among those who have, 75% say the process requires relatively little effort.
We believe sponsors should consider a re-enrollment program to better align participants with age-appropriate default investments while also preserving participant choice through an opt-out process.
For instance, some participants may maintain overly aggressive portfolios as they approach retirement; on the flip side, others may remain too conservative early in their careers. Re-enrollment can help address these situations and improve alignment between a person’s retirement objectives and portfolio construction.
When it comes to investment menus, the survey showed most plan sponsors continue to favor simplicity. Typical DC plans offer between 10 and 19 investment options for participants, with a target-date series generally counted as a single option. This reflects an ongoing balance between providing meaningful choice and avoiding participant confusion.
Vehicle choice is also shifting. Mutual funds remain widely used, but collective investment trusts (CITs) have gained significant traction. Survey respondents reported that 85% of plans offer mutual funds while 78% offer CITs, highlighting how sponsors increasingly view CITs as attractive institutional vehicles because of their flexibility and cost advantages.
What was the level of effort required to conduct an investment re-enrollment?
Source: Capital Group’s 2026 Institutional Retirement Survey of Plan Sponsors. As of May 2026.
Over the past few decades, sponsors have made tremendous strides in helping participants accumulate assets in their retirement plans. Now, for those who remain in-plan after retirement, sponsors are focused on helping them draw regular income and make their money last, a process known as decumulation.
Our survey found that 61% of plans do not yet offer a specific investment product or approach to address decumulation. Of the 39% that do, they are tackling it in several ways, led by implementing a retirement income strategy within a target-date series. That said, no single solution has emerged as a clear favorite.
Most popular retirement income options
Source: Capital Group’s 2026 Institutional Retirement Survey of Plan Sponsors. As of May 2026.
We asked sponsors: What’s the biggest trend that may disrupt how you manage your DC plan in the next five years? Based on the responses, we would characterize them as follows:
Alternatives on the radar
Source: Capital Group’s 2026 Institutional Retirement Survey of Plan Sponsors. As of May 2026.
Retirement plans are evolving from accumulation vehicles into holistic retirement solutions. Sponsors face a challenge that spans the full retirement journey, from enabling participants to save enough and invest appropriately to identifying vehicles that can convert accumulated nest eggs into sustainable income.
Our survey suggests meaningful progress. Sponsors are embracing automatic features to encourage savings rates, exploring new ways to improve investment outcomes and evaluating approaches to turn a lifetime of savings into a reliable retirement income.
Don't miss our latest insights.
Participant Education
Plan Design
Plan Design
Participant Education
Get the Capital Ideas newsletter in your inbox every other week