Important information

This website is for Financial Intermediaries in Luxembourg only.

 

If you are an Individual Investor click here, if you are an Institutional Investor click here. Should you be looking for information for another location, please click here.

 

By clicking, you acknowledge that you have fully understood and accepted the Legal and Regulatory Information.

OUTLOOK Economic outlook: Higher uncertainty, lower growth

There are many ways to describe the outlook for the US and world economies. But at the midpoint of 2025, one word has risen to the top of the lexicon: uncertainty.

 

A lack of clarity over US trade policy — with rising tariffs at the center of the storm — has delivered a shock to the global economy. For the first time since 2022, US GDP in the first quarter declined. Some companies stopped issuing forward guidance. Capital expenditures have been delayed. Cargo volumes have plummeted at major ports. Hiring has slowed.

 

As policy uncertainty rises, global economic growth projections are falling. Downward revisions have been issued for the US, Europe, Japan and many emerging markets, based on the latest available figures from the International Monetary Fund. Recent trade negotiations involving the US, Europe and China are encouraging but much remains to be done.

Economic growth projections are down across the board

This chart presents a series of horizontal bars showing the International Monetary Fund real GDP growth estimates for 2025, comparing projections from October 2024 and April 2025, respectively, with both estimates shown for each region. For emerging markets, the April 2025 estimate was 3.7% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 4.2%. For the world, the April 2025 estimate was 2.8% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 3.2%. For Canada, the April 2025 estimate was 1.4% vs. the October estimate of 2.4%. For the United States, the April 2025 estimate was 1.8% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 2.2%. For the Euro area, the April 2025 estimate was 0.8% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 1.2%. For Japan, the April 2025 estimate was 0.6% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 1.1%.This chart presents a series of horizontal bars showing the International Monetary Fund real GDP growth estimates for 2025, comparing projections from October 2024 and April 2025, respectively, with both estimates shown for each region. For emerging markets, the April 2025 estimate was 3.7% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 4.2%. For the world, the April 2025 estimate was 2.8% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 3.2%. For Canada, the April 2025 estimate was 1.4% vs. the October estimate of 2.4%. For the United States, the April 2025 estimate was 1.8% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 2.2%. For the Euro area, the April 2025 estimate was 0.8% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 1.2%. For Japan, the April 2025 estimate was 0.6% vs. the October 2024 estimate of 1.1%.

Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, April 2025. Reflects latest IMF projections as of 31 May 2025. Real GDP is adjusted for inflation, providing a more accurate measure of economic growth.

“Many companies are hitting the pause button because they don’t know what the rules are going to be a week, a month or a year from now,” Capital Group economist Darrell Spence explains. “Even if some tariffs are ultimately lowered or rescinded, this pause effect is going to have an impact. Whether that pushes us into a recession or not remains an open question, but it raises the risk significantly.”

 

In some ways, the uncertainty has become an economic data point that must be taken into account, much as we look at other hard data such as employment, consumer spending and business investment, Spence adds. “I think so much of forecasting the economy right now is a forecast of policy. And that's difficult to do when the policy can change so quickly.”

 

Market volatility returns in force

 

Market volatility has risen sharply in the first half of the year as the US launched a series of new tariffs against virtually every trading partner, including Canada, Mexico and China. In a now familiar pattern, the news shook stock and bond markets, followed by powerful rallies when the tariffs were later reduced or paused.

 

By the end of May, US stocks — as represented by the S&P 500 Index — had recovered nearly all of the earlier losses as investors turned a favourable eye toward the prospects for revised trade deals.

 

“We probably reached a point of maximum uncertainty in April,” says Jody Jonsson, an equity portfolio manager. That is when the largest series of tariffs was announced on what President Donald Trump called Liberation Day. “Since then we’ve seen some encouraging progress. If we can resolve more of this uncertainty, I think markets may have a smoother ride in the second half of the year.”

 

Four scenarios for global realignment

 

Taking a step back and looking at the big picture, Jonsson observes that the world is clearly changing in ways not seen in decades. This global realignment — politically, militarily, economically — is disruptive and likely to remain so until a new order takes shape.

 

“We are in the middle of a fundamental restructuring of the geopolitical order as we've known it since the end of World War II,” she says. “The integrated global system we’ve come to rely on over the past several decades is rapidly changing, and it may look very different in future.”

 

Capital Group’s Night Watch — a team of economists, political analysts and portfolio managers — is seeking to understand these changes through scenario analysis. Rather than make predictions, they identify a range of potential outcomes, then connect them to investment implications.

 

In their initial analysis, they have identified four large-scale scenarios that could play out in coming years as the world seeks a new equilibrium. A global trade war and shifting political alliances could slow global economic growth, boost inflation and raise the risk of a recession. On the other hand, swift and successful trade negotiations could spark a market rally.

A world in transition: Scenario planning for the future

A grid of four boxes represents different scenarios for global realignment. The vertical axis illustrates a potential geopolitical shift toward traditional alliances (with an arrow pointing up) or expansionist policies (with an arrow pointing down), while the horizontal axis indicates a potential shift toward economic decoupling (with an arrow pointing left) or trade deals (with an arrow pointing right). Each box lists sectors that could potentially benefit under the respective scenario, indicated by up and down arrows. The top left box, the trade battlefront scenario, shows defense and aerospace, domestic businesses, and automation marked with up arrows, indicating potential benefits, while consumer discretionary and global trade have down arrows. The top right box, the grand bargains scenario, shows up arrows for consumer discretionary, financials, and global trade, and down arrows for consumer staples and utilities and gold. In the bottom left box, the assertive nationalism scenario, sectors such as defense and aerospace, consumer staples and utilities, real estate, and gold are marked with up arrows, while cyclical companies and the trade weighted dollar have down arrows. Lastly, the great powers scenario (bottom right box) indicates potential benefits for sectors like defense and aerospace, as well as cyber and drone manufacturing, with down arrows for semiconductors, the 10-year Treasury yield, and global trade.A grid of four boxes represents different scenarios for global realignment. The vertical axis illustrates a potential geopolitical shift toward traditional alliances (with an arrow pointing up) or expansionist policies (with an arrow pointing down), while the horizontal axis indicates a potential shift toward economic decoupling (with an arrow pointing left) or trade deals (with an arrow pointing right). Each box lists sectors that could potentially benefit under the respective scenario, indicated by up and down arrows. The top left box, the trade battlefront scenario, shows defense and aerospace, domestic businesses, and automation marked with up arrows, indicating potential benefits, while consumer discretionary and global trade have down arrows. The top right box, the grand bargains scenario, shows up arrows for consumer discretionary, financials, and global trade, and down arrows for consumer staples and utilities and gold. In the bottom left box, the assertive nationalism scenario, sectors such as defense and aerospace, consumer staples and utilities, real estate, and gold are marked with up arrows, while cyclical companies and the trade weighted dollar have down arrows. Lastly, the great powers scenario (bottom right box) indicates potential benefits for sectors like defense and aerospace, as well as cyber and drone manufacturing, with down arrows for semiconductors, the 10-year Treasury yield, and global trade.

Source: Capital Group. Scenarios reflect analysis of Capital Group’s Night Watch team as of April 2025, and are not predictive of future outcomes.Source: Capital Group. Scenarios reflect analysis of Capital Group’s Night Watch team as of April 2025, and are not predictive of future outcomes.

Much depends on the outcome of trade negotiations currently under way. But given their complexity and the vast number of trading partners involved, it could take a long time to hammer out the details, says Tom Cooney, Capital Group’s international policy adviser and a former diplomat with the US Department of State.

 

“It took many years to build the post-war order, and it could be many more before a new order emerges,” Cooney explains. “Trade deals, in particular, normally take several years to negotiate, so I think we have a long journey ahead of us.”

 

Will central banks come to the rescue?

 

Officials at the world’s major central banks — chiefly, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB) — are watching closely as these events unfold. The ECB has already started cutting rates, and many investors believe the Fed will too, as tariffs threaten economic growth. However, rising consumer prices are making that decision difficult, since lower rates could reignite inflation.

 

In the US, inflation has remained stubbornly high in recent months, hovering around 2.5% to 3% on an annualised basis. That is above the Fed’s 2% target. Even so, bond investors are expecting the Fed’s first rate cut of the year to come in July, followed by two or three more before the end of the year.

The Fed is expected to loosen monetary policy this summer

A line stair chart shows the change in the target U.S. federal funds rate since June of 2022 through December 2024, and three projections of what the monthly effective federal funds rate could be based on futures pricing, extending through June 2026. These projections are represented as three separate lines splitting off the actual federal funds rate of 4.5% at the end of May 2025. The dates represented include December 31, 2024, April 4, 2025, and May 31, 2025. On December 31, 2024, the market-implied Fed Funds target rate for June 2026 was 3.9% and showed a gradual path down from current levels; on April 4, the figure in June of 2026 had dropped to 3.1%, illustrating expectations for a slightly deeper near-term decline in rates. As of May 31, 2025, the market-implied Fed Funds target rate for June 2026 rates had risen to around 3.4%, showing a more gradual but still steady decline in rates.A line stair chart shows the change in the target U.S. federal funds rate since June of 2022 through December 2024, and three projections of what the monthly effective federal funds rate could be based on futures pricing, extending through June 2026. These projections are represented as three separate lines splitting off the actual federal funds rate of 4.5% at the end of May 2025. The dates represented include December 31, 2024, April 4, 2025, and May 31, 2025. On December 31, 2024, the market-implied Fed Funds target rate for June 2026 was 3.9% and showed a gradual path down from current levels; on April 4, the figure in June of 2026 had dropped to 3.1%, illustrating expectations for a slightly deeper near-term decline in rates. As of May 31, 2025, the market-implied Fed Funds target rate for June 2026 rates had risen to around 3.4%, showing a more gradual but still steady decline in rates.

Sources: Capital Group, Bloomberg Index Services Ltd., US Federal Reserve. Fed funds target rate reflects the upper bound of the Federal Open Markets Committee’s (FOMC) target range for overnight lending among US banks. As of 31 May 2025.

“While the US economy is showing some signs of weakness, employment remains strong, so the Fed probably isn’t going to take action too quickly or too aggressively,” says Chitrang Purani, a fixed income portfolio manager.

 

“So long as labour markets don’t weaken dramatically, the Fed has good reason to stay patient with inflation remaining above target,” Purani explains. He views current market pricing of the federal funds rate at around 3.8% by the end of the year, down from roughly 4.3% today, as a fair level based on the balance of risks.

 

“I do expect US growth and global growth to slow in the face of tariffs and trade war uncertainty,” he adds, “but I think it’s too early to call for a recession.”

 

How to avoid a recession

 

What needs to happen for the US and the world to steer clear of an economic downturn?

 

There are already signs that it will not happen right away. Most of the economic data seen so far suggests that the US economy will expand in the second quarter, Spence says. A 6% rise for the S&P 500 Index in May also indicates that investors are not expecting an immediate tariff-induced downturn.

 

“If the largest culprit for triggering a recession is a trade war, then dialing back the trade war is obviously a helpful step,” Spence says. “And it has been dialed back in the past few weeks. To remove the uncertainty, however, I think we would need to see an announcement that the trade war is over. Otherwise, it may be difficult to convince businesses and consumers to move forward with confidence.”

The lesson? Market declines can be painful to endure, but rather than trying to time the market, investors would be wise to stay the course. To weather market volatility, they should seek diversification across stocks and bonds, while periodically examining their risk tolerance for elevated volatility. Though it may feel like this time is different, markets have shown resilience throughout history when confronted by wars, pandemics and other crises.

The lesson? Market declines can be painful to endure, but rather than trying to time the market, investors would be wise to stay the course. To weather market volatility, they should seek diversification across stocks and bonds, while periodically examining their risk tolerance for elevated volatility. Though it may feel like this time is different, markets have shown resilience throughout history when confronted by wars, pandemics and other crises.

Darrell Spence is an economist with 32 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Occidental College. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation and is a member of the National Association for Business Economics. 

Jody Jonsson is vice chair of Capital Group, president of Capital Research and Management Company and an equity portfolio manager. She has 38 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). She holds an MBA from Stanford and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Princeton.

Tom Cooney is an international policy advisor and has 31 years of foreign affairs experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds a master's degree in international business studies from the University of South Carolina and a bachelor's degree in communications from Cornell University. 

Chitrang Purani is a fixed income portfolio manager with 21 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds an MBA from the University of Chicago and a bachelor's in finance from Northern Illinois University. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. It is not possible to invest directly in an index, which is unmanaged. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may lose some or all of your initial investment. This information is not intended to provide investment, tax or other advice, or to be a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.
 
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. All information is as at the date indicated unless otherwise stated. Some information may have been obtained from third parties, and as such the reliability of that information is not guaranteed.
 
Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organisation; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.