For many asset owners, public equities represent the largest allocation of capital, and often risk, in their overall portfolio. While structuring a global public equity portfolio has evolved over time, given market developments over the past 15 years, we wanted to sharpen our thinking around regional correlations, country of domicile vs. geographical revenue attribution and the efficacy of an active management approach. Our analysis suggests that investors may benefit from an approach to public equity that applies skillful stock selection across a global opportunity set, rather than prioritizing regional mandates or other subsets of the public equity universe.
Due to the relatively high level of volatility associated with holding equities, it’s hard to escape their gravitational pull on total portfolio risk and return. Among public asset classes, equities are associated with significant risk (and expected return), whether in your home country or externally. Other exposures, such as interest rates and inflation, can certainly impact the total portfolio, but the magnitude stemming from equity is simply greater. Given how much risk is at stake, it makes sense to spend the time carefully thinking through and crafting an equity portfolio.
Whether you’re structuring a defined benefit pension plan’s allocation, designing a foundation’s portfolio or the equity sleeve of a target date glide path, equities almost certainly play a central role in the associated risk-return tradeoffs.
For the in-depth analysis, please download the full report below.