Important information

This website is for Institutions & Consultants only. By clicking, you acknowledge that you have fully understood and accepted the Legal and Regulatory Information.

Markets & Economy Could US GDP growth hit 5% this year?

The resilience of the US economy never fails to amaze me. Despite all the turmoil in the world, the US economy somehow manages to look past it, power through it, and come out stronger on the other side.

 

Along those lines, there is a lively debate among economists these days over whether US economic growth could accelerate to 5% this year. That’s a number we haven’t seen on a sustained, multiyear basis since the 1960s and 1970s. Over the last two decades, US gross domestic product (GDP) growth has generally been less than half that amount — averaging roughly 2.1%.

 

What needs to happen to return to the days of 5% growth? A lot. But based on my analysis, it is within the realm of possibility. And it is really not too far off, given that the most recent GDP print (3Q 2025) came in at 4.4% annualised.

 

US economic growth has slowed in recent decades

 

US real GDP growth (annual % change)

Don’t discount election year politics

 

The first consideration is that 2026 is an election year. The US midterm elections are just 10 months away, and President Trump has made it clear he wants to run the economy hot as we head towards November. That means bringing interest rates down, wages up, boosting the labour market, and using government stimulus measures to put money directly in the hands of American consumers.

 

Since consumer spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of the US economy, greater consumption is the key to reaching 5% GDP growth. Simply put, we need more people to buy more goods and services. We need wage growth to rise from 3.5% today to roughly 5%. We need job growth in the range of 200,000 per month. We need rent, oil prices and food prices to decline. And we need statutory US tariff rates to roll back to 10% or lower, from roughly 17% today.

 

I think the US Federal Reserve would need to reduce short-term rates more than the two cuts priced into markets this year, taking the federal funds rate below 3%, which is highly accommodative. In turn, we need 10-year Treasury rates, which influence borrowing costs of all kinds, to fall toward 3%. We need home mortgage rates at 4%. And we need to see a refinancing wave to help fuel a recovery in the hard-hit commercial real estate market.

 

Stimulus measures should boost consumption

 

Numerous government stimulus measures are already in place — from tax cuts included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, to retroactive tax refunds, to massive tax breaks and subsidies for companies that agree to move their manufacturing operations to the United States. More recently, the president has championed the idea of “tariff dividends” for US citizens under certain income thresholds, though such a move typically requires an act of Congress.

Graphic shows an image of the United States, along with examples of stimulus measures, including lower interest rates, an end to quantitative easing, retroactive tax refunds, Made in the USA incentives and deregulation. Also shown are potential GDP tailwinds, including higher consumer spending, accelerating real wages, lower unemployment, lower rent, food and energy costs, increased CAPEX spending, corporate profit growth, lower policy uncertainty and lower long-term interest rates.

Source: Capital Group. QT, or quantitative tightening, refers to policies that reduce the US Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. Capital expenditure (CAPEX) is money invested for acquisitions, upgrades and renovations. It can be tangible (i.e., real estate) or intangible (i.e., licenses, software).

We know from the pandemic years that if you give US consumers money, they will spend it. Americans aren’t too keen on saving. Larger tax refunds are expected to put an extra US$100 billion into the hands of consumers this year, much of it landing in bank accounts at the start of the summer vacation season.

 

Last year, US households received tax refunds averaging slightly more than US$3,000. This year, the average refund should be around US$4,000, according to projections from the US Treasury Department.

 

AI-powered productivity boost

 

Finally, we need to see a rebound on the industrial side of the US economy, which has been stagnant for the past three years. That’s an unusually long recession for US industrial activity and, in my view, it isn’t likely to continue much longer. We are already seeing evidence of increasing inventory investments as the global economy, along with the US economy, picks up speed.

 

Moreover, many companies are using artificial intelligence (AI) to boost productivity. This is a trend that I think many investors are underestimating. Yes, AI is hurting some workers, particularly in entry-level jobs, but it’s also turning more experienced employees into AI-powered super workers. That should enable these employees to pursue higher wage increases over time.

 

I think we are in the early innings of this AI productivity boost across corporate America. Thus, I’ve increased my US productivity estimate to 3% this year, up from 2.5% previously, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it rises to 4% in a 1990s-type, tech-inspired scenario.

 

2.8% GDP growth is more realistic

 

While I think 5% GDP growth is possible this year, there are also many risks associated with such an optimistic forecast. In the stock market, we would call that “priced for perfection.” It leaves no room for disruption from trade disputes, geopolitical conflicts, labour market weakness, social unrest or market turbulence that could result from one or more of those events.

 

Given the resilience of the US economy, offset by the chances of a geopolitical or domestic event hampering growth at times, I have increased my GDP forecast to 2.8% for the full year 2026. That is above consensus and higher than my previous forecast in December.

 

At the end of the day, I feel comfortable being above consensus for two reasons: the powerful influence of an election year, and the impressive productivity gains we are seeing as the AI revolution energises the US economy.

Jared Franz is an economist with 20 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2025). He holds a PhD in economics from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Northwestern University.

Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. It is not possible to invest directly in an index, which is unmanaged. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may lose some or all of your initial investment. This information is not intended to provide investment, tax or other advice, or to be a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.
 
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. All information is as at the date indicated unless otherwise stated. Some information may have been obtained from third parties, and as such the reliability of that information is not guaranteed.
 
Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organisation; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.