Global Equities
Rob Lovelace on what’s in store for 2024
Rob Lovelace
Equity Portfolio Manager and Chair, Capital International, Inc.

As we embark on a new year, the challenges ahead are well defined. Interest rates are elevated. Elections are upcoming. And U.S. stock indices are near all-time highs. Are these events setting the stage for a disappointing pullback or another bull run?

In this wide-ranging Q&A, Rob Lovelace, veteran portfolio manager and former president of Capital Group, offers his view on where markets are headed, the rise of the Magnificent Seven, the interest rate environment and select investment themes driving his portfolio decisions.

What’s your market outlook for 2024?

Looking at today’s market, there is some similarity between the Nifty 50 period of the 1960s and 1970s, the technology bubble of the late 1990s, and the years leading up to the financial crisis that occurred between 2008 and 2009. When you examine the current period, it is characterized by the remarkable gains of the Magnificent Seven (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla). Investors are rightly concerned about the valuations of those companies and the narrowness of the market gains. In that group, there are clear similarities to the Nifty 50 (IBM, Sears, General Electric, among others) and worries about market concentration at that time.

None of those periods are exactly the same as today, but they do rhyme in certain ways. If you recall those three periods, in all three cases, there was a market decline associated with an economic event, a recession. They were also long market cycles. They were not like the sharp COVID downturn or the 1987 market crash. They were multi-year events. If there is some similarity today, then we should expect to see significant volatility in 2024. This is also an election year, and election years are often volatile. So, as a portfolio manager, I am prepared for that. And I am prepared for what typically comes next, which is a sustained period of recovery.

Do you think the Magnificent Seven are overvalued?

It’s more like a warning signal. Any time you get a sector or a concentrated group of stocks that stand so far apart from the rest, you need to pay attention because it’s usually a warning signal. Whether it was the financial sector before the global financial crisis, or internet stocks in the late ‘90s, or oil stocks at various times, the market is telling you something you need to know.

These seven stocks now represent nearly 30% of the S&P 500 Index. That should get your attention. We’ve taken the time to go back and do research on the Nifty 50 — which, it turns out, was not 50 stocks but more like 40-something. That research revealed some important lessons. As a group, those 40-ish stocks were overvalued. As a group, they went up a lot, and then they came down a lot. But about half of them were worth holding through the whole event because they recovered on the other side of it.

The Magnificent Seven and Nifty 50: We’ve seen this movie before

The image shows a dual line graph comparing the market concentration of the Nifty 50 stocks versus the Magnificent Seven stocks. The image shows the combined companies’ market value as a percentage of the S&P 500 ranging from 5% to 40% over a 10-year period. In 1964, the Nifty 50 had a combined value of 17.7%. In 1974, it rose to 34.9%. In 2013, the Magnificent Seven had a combined value of 8.7%. In 2023, it rose to 27.4%. Examples of the Nifty 50 companies include IBM, Sears Roebuck, General Electric, Eastman Kodak, Procter & Gamble, Merck, Dow Chemical, Xerox and Coca-Cola. The Magnificent Seven are Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Tesla and Alphabet.

Sources: Capital Group, RIMES, S&P Capital IQ, Standard & Poor's. The analysis includes 41 companies among the list of "Nifty Fifty" companies for which market capitalization data exists continuously from 1964 to 1974, using both RIMES and S&P Capital IQ. The Nifty Fifty was a list of U.S. companies identified by Morgan Guaranty Trust whose valuation multiples traded at levels well above the S&P 500 given their perceived growth prospects at the time. The "Magnificent Seven" refers to the seven largest contributors to the S&P 500 in 2023. Company examples shown here for the Nifty 50 represent some of the largest companies in the group from various industries and are for illustrative purposes only. As of December 31, 2023.

It isn’t as easy as saying, “This group of stocks is overvalued; therefore, we shouldn’t own them.” I would say, ignore them to your peril. But I would also say, like the Nifty 50, you don't just buy them as a group, because they are not a real group. They are not an industry. They are not driven by the same factors.

What's driving Tesla is different from what's driving Netflix or Meta or Microsoft. The Magnificent Seven is a phenomenon. And what the phenomenon tells you is that there is risk in the market. But it doesn't tell you whether you should buy, hold or sell. This is where the benefit of active management comes in. The passive investor gets the entire group. Active investors get to pick and choose based on the fundamental prospects for each company. That’s how I look at it.

Will higher interest rates hurt the stock market?

People tend to assume that higher rates are bad for stocks and lower rates are good. But it really depends on the company and the sector, how it plays out, and how long it lasts. So that rule of thumb is weak. What we've seen so far is that the markets have been strong not because of interest rates going up or down, but because the economy hasn't rolled over. The assumption was that higher rates would force us into a recession, which would be bad for corporate earnings, which is ultimately what the market cares about. Instead, we've seen stronger-than-expected earnings in many different companies and sectors.

Interest rate hikes haven’t necessarily been bad for stocks

The image shows a combined line and bar graph that compares the S&P 500’s returns versus the federal funds rate in three-year intervals between 1982 and 2023. It lists the federal funds rate in percentages from 0 to 14 and the S&P 500 total return index value from 0 to 22,500. The image highlights the S&P total return during prior hiking cycles: 18% from March 29, 1983 to August 21, 1984, 23% from February 11, 1987 to May 16, 1989, 3% from February 4, 1994 to February 1, 1995, 7.9% from June 30, 1999 to May 16, 2000, 15.7% from June 30, 2004 to June 29, 2006, 28.6% from December 16, 2015 to December 19, 2018, and 7.2% from March 16, 2022 to July 26, 2023. It shows that the S&P 500 total return index value was relatively neutral between 1982 and 1994, then ascended moderately in response to rate adjustments through 2012 and then experienced a dramatic rise through 2021 with little if any correlation to the federal funds rate. In this chart, the beginning value of the federal funds rate is 8.95% in December 1982, and the ending value is 5.33% in December 2023.

Sources: Capital Group, U.S. Federal Reserve, Standard & Poor's. S&P total returns during prior hiking cycles are based on the total return for the S&P 500 Index between the date of the first increase in the target federal funds rate and the date of the final increase in the target federal funds rate. The federal funds rate shown is the average monthly effective federal funds rate, which reflects the volume-weighted median interest rate that depository institutions charge each other for overnight loans of funds. As of December 31, 2023. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. Returns are in USD.

As it turns out, the Federal Reserve and other central banks raised interest rates aggressively, and the market didn’t care as much as we thought it would. This period provides a good reminder to people that higher rates do not always equal lower markets. And lower rates do not always equal higher markets.

Keep in mind, we're in a slightly different environment now. With rates as high as they are, people assume they will go back down. That's all anyone is talking about. Everyone has convinced themselves that rates will go down again, and it’s just a matter of when and how much. That’s another reason I think the risk is to the downside. The risk is that rates stay higher for longer, and that’s yet another reason why I think the market has more downside risk in this current construct.

How concerned are you about election year volatility?

Election years are always volatile. Markets want certainty and, in the last few election cycles, the issue that has been challenging is not which party won, but the fact that nobody won convincingly. This time around, I think we could have a similar set of circumstances, and no one will be satisfied no matter the outcome. There may be court challenges. There could be protests. And that’s never good for markets. So we’ll probably have some market strength at times during the campaign season, and then as we get closer to the election, people will get nervous.

Then usually toward the end of the year, as whoever won gets ready for the inauguration and cabinet appointments are announced, people will say, "Oh, maybe I don't like the candidate, but the cabinet looks good." And that will begin to build a base from which the markets have a chance to come back.

Do election issues ever factor into your investment decisions?

I typically look beyond the election cycle and aim for an average holding period in my portfolios of roughly eight years — essentially two presidential terms. That said, sometimes election uncertainty can provide attractive entry points for investing in companies that get caught up in a heated political debate.

For instance, this often happens in the pharmaceutical industry when politicians take aim at high drug prices. When everyone worries that a new government policy is going to hurt a sector, that concern is often overblown. High-quality companies sometimes get caught in political crosshairs, which can create a buying opportunity. I keep an eye out for those types of events during an election campaign.

Market volatility in election years can present investment opportunities

The image shows a split bar chart with a range and average of cumulative returns in percentages from –60% to 120%. The time frame covers U.S. presidential elections from 1992 to 2021. Returns are listed by S&P sector, one year before and one year after an election. Those average returns are: communication services 3.1% before, 11.4% after; consumer discretionary 5.9% before, 18.9% after; consumer staples 9.3% before, 10.6% after; energy 3.2% before, 27.4% after; financials 4.6% before, 24.5% after; health care 5.8.% before, 15.7% after; industrials 6.9% before, 16.7% after; information technology, 5.4% before, 20.1% after; materials 1.2% before, 17.1% after; utilities 10.3% before, 8.7% after; and S&P 500 Index 5.4% before, 16.8% after. The chart shows that, with the exception of the utilities sector, average returns increased one year after an election versus one year before an election.

Sources: Capital Group, Refinitiv Datastream, Standard & Poor’s. Includes all elections since 1992, as of December 31, 2023. October 31 used as a proxy for each election date in the calculations of returns one year before and after an election. For example, the first year measured before the 1992 election is October 31, 1991-October 31, 1992, and the last year measured after the 2020 election is October 31, 2020-October 31, 2021. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. Returns are in USD.

What investment themes interest you today?

The number one theme on my mind as an investor is related to health care. Within the sector, there are two big developments. One is the explosion in popularity of GLP-1 drugs, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, that help with weight management and appetite suppression. The other is personalized medicine, or the creation of medicines tailored to the individual through DNA mapping.

Both areas are incredibly exciting and have the potential to be truly game changing. We are also looking at how these developments could impact other companies, positively or negatively. For instance, the research shows that these drugs not only help with appetite suppression, but they can also affect behaviours such as alcohol consumption, gambling and other habits involving impulse control.

As investors, we need to think about what that means for alcoholic beverage makers, gaming stocks, food companies and a wide variety of other companies. It may take a long time for these impacts to materialize, but the stocks will move before that, so it’s something we are spending a lot of time researching today. These ripple effects could wind up being important. There will always be winners, and there will always be companies that get disrupted. We, as long-term investors, must consider a multitude of outcomes.

Anything in addition to health care?

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is a theme that we all need to understand. It's less clear to me than in the health care sector who are the immediate beneficiaries. One always thinks of certain computer chip companies, but even there I'm not sure it's going to be sustained at the windfall levels we see now. I think we're all coming around to the fact that having an AI product that's 90% accurate is fun and helpful, but it doesn't present the existential threat to jobs that some had feared.

As we saw with the gig economy, I don’t think AI will eliminate many jobs, it will just shift them around and impact employees in different ways that may have implications for salaries and benefits. I believe AI is something that will affect every company, but in ways that may be less predictable than many people think. So it’s something we should watch closely, and we need to see how it plays out across all sectors, not just the tech sector.

What's your long-term stock market outlook?

Well, when it comes to the long-term compounding of the stock market, the rule of thumb that I learned in school was that 7% was the average. To be clear, that wasn’t a guarantee, and markets moved around as much then as do now. Probably more important, it wasn't adjusted for inflation. So, when I was early in my career, half of the expected return was just inflation, and half or less of it was real. So back in the day, a lot of us thought that as inflation came down, the total return on the market also would come down.

What's fascinating is, not only did it not come down, it went up. If you look at the long-term numbers now, even with the bear market in 2022, the compounding of the U.S. stock market since the 1970s was north of 9%. The incredible thing about the way the stock market works is, as long as you've got companies doing amazing things, enabling them to grow and create new products, it's a flywheel. It's a geometric process, not an arithmetic process, in terms of the benefits to investors.

We've talked about what's happening in health care, technology, AI and economic growth generally. And even if overall economic growth rates are muted going forward, there are a lot of good things happening with companies in the stock market. So my long-term view remains positive. I’m sticking with 7%.

Rob Lovelace is an equity portfolio manager and chair of Capital International, Inc. He has 38 years of investment experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a bachelor’s degree in mineral economics from Princeton University. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation. 

S&P 500 Index is a market capitalization-weighted index based on the results of approximately 500 widely held common stocks.


Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

Unless otherwise indicated, the investment professionals featured do not manage Capital Group‘s Canadian mutual funds.

References to particular companies or securities, if any, are included for informational or illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as an endorsement by Capital Group. Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any investment funds or current holdings of any investment funds. These views should not be considered as investment advice nor should they be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and not be comprehensive or to provide advice. For informational purposes only; not intended to provide tax, legal or financial advice. We assume no liability for any inaccurate, delayed or incomplete information, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. The information contained herein has been supplied without verification by us and may be subject to change. Capital Group funds are available in Canada through registered dealers. For more information, please consult your financial and tax advisors for your individual situation.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual events and results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made herein. We encourage you to consider these and other factors carefully before making any investment decisions and we urge you to avoid placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The S&P 500 Composite Index (“Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2024 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

FTSE source: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the "LSE Group"). © LSE Group 2024. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies. "FTSE®" is a trade mark of the relevant LSE Group companies and is used by any other LSE Group company under licence. All rights in the FTSE Russell indices or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indices or data and no party may rely on any indices or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company's express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication. The index is unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg’s licensors approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

MSCI does not approve, review or produce reports published on this site, makes no express or implied warranties or representations and is not liable whatsoever for any data represented. You may not redistribute MSCI data or use it as a basis for other indices or investment products.

Capital believes the software and information from FactSet to be reliable. However, Capital cannot be responsible for inaccuracies, incomplete information or updating of the information furnished by FactSet. The information provided in this report is meant to give you an approximate account of the fund/manager's characteristics for the specified date. This information is not indicative of future Capital investment decisions and is not used as part of our investment decision-making process.

Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.

All Capital Group trademarks are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc. or an affiliated company in Canada, the U.S. and other countries. All other company names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.

Capital Group funds are offered in Canada by Capital International Asset Management (Canada), Inc., part of Capital Group, a global investment management firm originating in Los Angeles, California in 1931. Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.

The Capital Group funds offered on this website are available only to Canadian residents.