Multi-sector income investing and the high-yield opportunity
Shannon Ward
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
David Bradin
Fixed Income Investment Director

High yield is finally deserving of its name again. The high-single-digit yields that the sector is offering are renewing investor interest in this asset class, even as the spectre of a recession raises some concerns in the short term. Investors may want to consider slowly wading into the high-yield pool, while being careful of diving straight into the deep end. 

“We do not believe in timing this market,” says fixed income portfolio manager Shannon Ward of Capital Group Multi-Sector Income FundTM (Canada). The fund invests in a blend of four primary higher income sectors in the fixed income universe: investment-grade bonds, emerging markets debt, securitized credit and yes, high yield, with the ability to increase or decrease allocations in each sector.

Among the four sectors, high yield is currently telegraphing positive signals.

History shows that when yields rise to the high-single-digit range, they tend not to stay that elevated for very long, as the discounted price and higher yields tend to draw in a broader cross section of investors. The carry (interest earned) that the high coupon provides also helps mitigate the risk of return volatility.

High-yield investors also benefit from cash flows arising from calls and tenders. This creates an ability to redeploy that cash in opportunities at potentially higher yields. 

We discuss here five factors that make the case for an increased exposure to high yield and how we are approaching this market in a period of economic uncertainty, as well as when macro factors are having a large influence on markets.

There is no doubt that we are in an uncertain economic environment. The U.S. could also be in a recession that is in large part the result of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s aggressive stance on fighting inflation. As expected, the Fed raised interest rates by 75 basis points at its September meeting. But how soft or shallow will the recession be?

If the Fed’s actions are not successful in bringing down inflation, or if they push the economy into a longer, deeper recession, the high-yield market — and credit and risk assets more broadly — could face a bumpy ride. 

Against that backdrop, an investment vehicle that can increase or decrease exposures to high yield with the flexibility to redeploy assets to other higher income sectors may be prudent.

One could argue that the negative scenario is reflected in high-yield prices already, given that returns for most areas of fixed income were in the negative high single digits through the end of August this year. On the other hand, if the Fed manages a “softer landing,” high-yield bonds could rally. Thus, it may make sense for investors to remain dexterous when building exposure to high yield. We believe several areas of the market could be resilient. In this environment, our focus is on quality: for example, one of our largest high-yield portfolios is invested 34% in bonds rated BB and 40% in bonds rated B.

1.    Stronger fundamentals and lower issuance support valuations

Even with a softer macroeconomic backdrop, the high-yield market appears healthier and more stable than it has been in many years. We have a weaker economic environment but a stronger asset class, and the combination has resulted in yield spreads of around  480 basis points (bps) that are in line with historical averages, bringing the yield to worst on the benchmark Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index to 8.4% as of the end of August.

High-yield spreads and yields are in line with their long-term averages for U.S. high yield

The chart depicts the option-adjusted spread and yield to worst for the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index for the periods from July 31, 2002, through August 31, 2022. The historical averages over the period for the index’s spread and yield, 513 basis points and 7.7%, respectively, are also depicted as a dotted line.

Source: Bloomberg. OAS = option-adjusted spread; YTW = yield to worst. Data as of August 31, 2022.

A second positive factor is the absence of near-term large-scale refinancing requirements. Savvy corporate management teams have tapped into the low-rate and favourable credit environment of the past few years to complete their financing requirements. Especially in 2021, companies were able to refinance their near-term debt at exceptionally low yields and push maturities out by several years. 

As a result, corporate borrowers have entered this period of rising rates with financing that has been locked in for a few years. Because of that, many can sit on the sidelines today and do not need to issue new debt at prevailing higher rates. Many companies don’t need to tap capital markets or refinance until 2025, so the volume of issuance could remain low for at least another year, unless rates fall or high-yield spreads tighten.

Year to date through August, there has been about US$92 billion in high-yield issuance in the U.S., compared to approximately US$366 billion for the same period last year. So, the opportunity set for us has shifted to the secondary market, where we are looking at relative value across capital structures and between issuers in the same industry, or even between industries.

We are concerned about the lower-rated segment of high-yield companies that were waiting for their own prospects to improve before refinancing their debt. These firms may have missed the window to capture the lowest rates. While they represent a small segment of the high-yield market today, they also present us with opportunities to find solid companies seeking fresh capital that will now have to come with higher coupons.

Many borrowers have time to refinance and are sitting on the sidelines 

The chart illustrates the U.S. dollar volume of high-yield bonds maturing in each calendar year from the remainder of 2022 through the end of 2030, and depicts the contrast between the relatively muted volume of such bonds maturing later this year and in calendar years 2023 and 2024, versus the markedly greater volume maturing in calendar years 2025 through 2030.

Source: Bloomberg. Data as of June 30, 2022. Illustrates dollar volume of high-yield bonds maturing in calendar years 2022 through 2030.

2.    Default rates are likely to remain low

Also supporting the high-yield asset class are solid economic fundamentals, which should keep default rates relatively low. At less than 1%, the latest 12 months’ default rate is very low by historical standards. When we evaluate future default probabilities, we consider the amount of bonds that are trading at distressed levels, because this can be an early indicator of future defaults. Today, distressed debt as a percentage of the high-yield universe is in the mid-single digits. Based on this metric, while we do expect the default rate to rise from very low levels, we are not forecasting a spike in defaults. 

Another factor that we consider is the universe of high-yield debt that is rated triple-C or below. This too, is around historical lows at about 12% of the high-yield market, compared to 20% in December 2007, prior to the recession following the global financial crisis. So, when we combine these three parameters — historically low default rates around 1%, triple-C and below-rated securities at about 12% of the market, and distressed debt stock in the mid-single digits as a percentage of the universe — it presents an overall supportive credit picture for the high-yield market.

High-yield default rates are near historic lows

This chart illustrates the default rate for high-yield bonds in each calendar year from 1998 through the year-to-date period for 2022. The average historical default rate for the period is indicated as a dotted line across the columns for each individual year. The average historical default rate for the period is 3.1%. The chart shows that recent default rates (for 2021 and the year-to-date period for 2022) are well below the historical average.

Source: J.P. Morgan. Trailing 12-month results. Data as of July 31, 2022.

3.    Risk of contagion from leveraged loan market is limited

The relationship between the high-yield and leveraged loan markets has evolved over the past decade. Historically, companies might have issued floating-rate loans as part of the secured portion of their capital structure, and separately issued fixed-rate unsecured bonds in the high-yield market. Today, many companies — often backed by private equity — that would have come to the high-yield market to finance themselves, have instead chosen to issue solely in the leveraged loan market. So, a lot of the risk traditionally associated with high-yield bond investing has migrated to the leveraged loan market. (Both the leveraged loan and private credit markets have expanded so rapidly that, today, their size, at about US$1.2 trillion, is similar to that of the high-yield market.) 

Companies that are tapping both the high-yield and the leveraged loan markets tend to be higher quality, larger firms issuing loans in conjunction with high-yield bonds, rather than to finance their entire capital structures. As a result, the high-yield market now is made up of stronger companies, based on credit ratings, and is also less exposed to private equity portfolio companies (which can be the most aggressively financed issuers in the debt markets). 

Companies that are seeking to be upgraded to investment-grade (BBB/Baa and above) can be attractive because they not only present an opportunity to earn a high coupon today, but can also benefit from the price appreciation that often comes from a rating upgrade as and when it occurs. Several large issuers in the high-yield market today have only been high-yield issuers since they were downgraded from investment grade during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and they seek to return to the investment-grade market. In many high-yield portfolios, we also have the flexibility to hold issues rated BBB once they are upgraded, so there’s nothing forcing us to part ways with many of these rising stars. In light of the current economic environment, we are focused more on higher quality companies that have the potential to weather a longer, more pronounced recession, and there are more of these than ever in the high-yield market.

Credit risk in the U.S. has migrated to the leveraged loan market

The chart illustrates the percentage of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index and the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan 100 Index rated BB or better. It illustrates that, since 2010, the proportion (on a market-value-weighted basis) of the High Yield Index rated BB or better has increased, while the proportion of the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan 100 Index rated BB or better has fallen.

Source: Bloomberg, S&P/LSTA. High yield represented by the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index. Leveraged loans represented by the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan 100 Index. Data as of June 30, 2022.

4.    Finding value across a spectrum of industries

Telecommunications has been a large part of the high-yield universe for many years. Another historically large segment, consumer discretionary credits such as lodging, gaming and cruise lines, saw their valuations recover with the reopening of the economy following the pandemic. We remain selective in these sectors given the uncertain economic outlook and the leverage that issuers in these sectors took on while they were shut down during the pandemic. 

We see value in certain subsectors that represent a smaller part of the high-yield market, such as asset managers and insurance brokers. Given the recurring revenue models, these types of businesses have the potential to do better than the more cyclical issuers in a soft economy or a rising rate environment. Many of these companies have had predictable cash flows, whether through management fees earned on the assets under management or via commissions earned from the sale of insurance products. 

Investment time horizons matter 

The chart illustrates the percentage of periods in which the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index has outpaced the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, depicting periods of positive and negative relative returns in USD. For one-year periods, the high yield index outpaced the aggregate index in 67% of periods. For three-year periods, High Yield outpaced the Aggregate in 83% of periods. And for five-year periods, High Yield outpaced the Aggregate in 94% of periods.

Bloomberg. Data as of August 31, 2022. Data incorporates the one-year, three-year and five-year rolling monthly periods between January 2002 and August 2022. Based in USD.

5.    Energy sector fundamentals have improved

Over the past decade, the energy segment of the high-yield market grew rapidly as issuance to finance oil/gas exploration and production ballooned. But when oil prices fell, many of those companies were forced to restructure their debts and cut back on capital spending. This wave of defaults is now behind us and  the energy segment is now much smaller than it was at its peak.

Today, the energy segment is the healthiest it has been in many years. As balance sheets have improved, capex plans have been curtailed, and as oil/gas prices have surged, energy has been the best performing subsector within the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index. Elevated oil/gas prices and restrained spending on exploration and production have transformed this segment from cash-burning to massively cash-generating, and management teams appear laser-focused on protecting their now-healthy balance sheets. And so, while the sector is still cyclical, we view it as less risky today and it also features a larger number of high-quality companies in which to invest. 

Bottom line

Assuming a duration of four years, given a 100-basis-point rise in interest rates, a high-yield fund would be expected to lose 4%. However, given recent yields of more than 8%, the risk of rising rates is mitigated by the high yield and coupons. Of course, additional factors could impact losses that a fund experiences.

In our view, the goal of investing in high yield is to try to manage the risks that are inherent in lower quality, lower rated companies and be appropriately compensated for the risk we take. At the same time, we are careful not to be too cautious and give up yield opportunities along the way. It is not advisable to try to time the high-yield market. We believe that investors willing to maintain a long-term perspective should consider a strategic allocation to high yield through a multi-sector income investment vehicle which can opportunistically invest in high yield and other higher income sectors depending on fundamentals, valuations and market outlooks.

Shannon Ward is a fixed income portfolio manager with 31 years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). She holds an MBA from the University of Southern California and a bachelor's degree in psychology from University of California, Santa Barbara.

David Bradin is a fixed income investment director. He has 18 years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds an MBA from Wake Forest University and a bachelor's degree in mediated communications from North Carolina State University.

A call option allows the issuer to redeem a bond prior to its maturity. A debt tender offer is an offer, typically by the issuer, to purchase all or a portion of its outstanding debt securities for cash at a price specified by the offeror.

Option-adjusted spread is a yield-spread calculation used to value securities with embedded options.

Yield to worst is the lowest yield that can be realized by either calling or putting on one of the available call/put dates or holding a bond to maturity.

Duration is a measure of the approximate sensitivity of a bond portfolio’s value to interest rate changes.

Bond ratings, which typically range from AAA/Aaa (highest) to D (lowest), are assigned by credit rating agencies such as Standard & Poor's, Moody’s and/or Fitch, as an indication of an issuer’s creditworthiness.

The S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index is a capped market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of 100 large loan facilities in the U.S. leveraged loan market, based upon market weightings, spreads and interest payments. The S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 B/BB Rating Index is a sub-index of the S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index and is composed of loans with ratings between BB+ and B-, as determined by S&P Global Ratings.

Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index covers the universe of U.S. fixed-rate, non-investment-grade debt. The index limits the maximum exposure of any one issuer to 2%. This index is unmanaged, and its results include reinvested distributions but do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions, account fees, expenses or income taxes.

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index represents the U.S. investment-grade fixed-rate bond market. This index is unmanaged, and its results include reinvested dividends and/or distributions but do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions, account fees, expenses or income taxes.

The S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index (“Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2022 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

This report, and any product, index or fund referred to herein, is not sponsored, endorsed or promoted in any way by J.P. Morgan or any of its affiliates who provide no warranties whatsoever, express or implied, and shall have no liability to any prospective investor, in connection with this report

Lower rated bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal than higher rated bonds.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. Investment funds are not guaranteed or covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit insurer. For investment funds other than money market funds, their values change frequently. For money market funds, there can be no assurances that the fund will be able to maintain its net asset value per security at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment in the fund will be returned to you. Past performance may not be repeated.

Unless otherwise indicated, the investment professionals featured do not manage Capital Group‘s Canadian mutual funds.

References to particular companies or securities, if any, are included for informational or illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as an endorsement by Capital Group. Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any investment funds or current holdings of any investment funds. These views should not be considered as investment advice nor should they be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and not be comprehensive or to provide advice. For informational purposes only; not intended to provide tax, legal or financial advice. We assume no liability for any inaccurate, delayed or incomplete information, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. The information contained herein has been supplied without verification by us and may be subject to change. Capital Group funds are available in Canada through registered dealers. For more information, please consult your financial and tax advisors for your individual situation.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual events and results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made herein. We encourage you to consider these and other factors carefully before making any investment decisions and we urge you to avoid placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The S&P 500 Composite Index (“Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2024 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

FTSE source: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the "LSE Group"). © LSE Group 2024. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies. "FTSE®" is a trade mark of the relevant LSE Group companies and is used by any other LSE Group company under licence. All rights in the FTSE Russell indices or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indices or data and no party may rely on any indices or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company's express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication. The index is unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg’s licensors approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

MSCI does not approve, review or produce reports published on this site, makes no express or implied warranties or representations and is not liable whatsoever for any data represented. You may not redistribute MSCI data or use it as a basis for other indices or investment products.

Capital believes the software and information from FactSet to be reliable. However, Capital cannot be responsible for inaccuracies, incomplete information or updating of the information furnished by FactSet. The information provided in this report is meant to give you an approximate account of the fund/manager's characteristics for the specified date. This information is not indicative of future Capital investment decisions and is not used as part of our investment decision-making process.

Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.

All Capital Group trademarks are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc. or an affiliated company in Canada, the U.S. and other countries. All other company names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.

Capital Group funds are offered in Canada by Capital International Asset Management (Canada), Inc., part of Capital Group, a global investment management firm originating in Los Angeles, California in 1931. Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.

The Capital Group funds offered on this website are available only to Canadian residents.