Capital Ideas

Investment insights from Capital Group

Categories
Japan
Investing in Japan no longer an either/or proposition
Gerald Du Manoir
Portfolio Manager

Portfolio manager Gerald Du Manoir has been investing in Japan for more than 20 years. Here he discusses the recent market changes that have altered his approach to whether — and where — to invest.


View transcript

Matt Miller: Let’s talk a little bit more about Japan, since we’ve covered a little bit of Europe and the U.S. How do you feel about the outlook longer term? What’s the right way to think about Japan?

Gerald Du Manoir: When I started managing money in international equities, there was a great tradition. You were either invested in Japan or you were out of Japan. It was very much a decision that was driven by the attractiveness of the cyclicality of Japan as an entire market.

Things have dramatically changed, and they’ve changed for two reasons. One is because after the better part of 20 years of very poor demographics, a really challenging price situation — not just inflation or deflation, but the whole infrastructure of price formation being very challenged, a compression of price, if you will, in the system — Japan has had to reinvent itself. And companies have really bifurcated between companies that get it and reinvented themselves — both from an intellectual property or research-and-development point of view — and companies that don’t and have just really dwindled into remaining just a local operator.

And so we’ve actually found a lot of attractive companies in Japan. They tend to really fall, as I said, in a couple of categories. One [is] global franchises that own a technology, for example. So that could be found in automation. That can be found in some of the pharmaceutical companies. That can be found in the gaming companies, electronic gaming companies.

But it can also be found in discount retail. So if you’re the average consumer in Japan, now you’re so used to that price deflation that you’re constantly thinking about something cheaper tomorrow. Often we refer to [that in] the U.S. as “everyday low price.”

So you find very big discount retailers. Whether it be in furniture, in electronics, these kind of companies do extremely well. Internet — so everything related to electronic platform with very good logistics or access — has been booming. So companies like SoftBank are good examples of that. And then lastly, I think it’s important to understand that in Japan there is such a need for social harmonization that medical providers and medical care systems have been very attractive areas.

Now, what does that leave out? That leaves out some of the financial companies, which need the inflation to come back. That leaves out some of the more traditional retailers and traditional department stores. That also leaves out some of the real estate conglomerates that exist. And in that part, I think you need so much macro help that — for now at least — we remain a little bit skeptical.

Matt Miller: Are you finding opportunities in firms that are based in Japan but are really global? Or is it also companies where their revenues and profits are basically in Japan? Is it both?

Gerald Du Manoir: I think the attractiveness of Japanese companies [is] really idiosyncratic. So it’s almost case by case.

Matt Miller: Right.

Gerald Du Manoir: Even more so than a lot of other places in the world, it’s really important to look at each of the companies. There used to be a great series of conglomerates in Japan that were global companies selling to everybody. But those really haven’t evolved that well — the Mitsubishi Heavys, the IHIs as examples.

But if you actually look at the companies that have been able to increase their R&D and increase their intellectual property, they’ve really become global players. So Keihin, Murata, Nidec — all these are very traditional Japanese companies that have become global, not just in their mentality and the way they’re run, but in the kind of products they deliver to the end markets.

China has been a big destination of Japanese know-how, but it’s also gone into technologies in Taiwan, in the U.S.: semiconductor technology, auto technology — everything that has to do with very high intellectual property components. And those kinds of companies are actually trading at a premium and trading at a valuation that is much higher than the Japanese market. So the market has recognized the quality and the value of these companies.

 


 



Gerald Du Manoir is an equity portfolio manager with 28 years of investment experience. He holds a degree in international finance from the Institut Superieur de Gaston in Paris.


Related Insights 

Hear from the investment team.

Don't miss out.

Get the Capital Ideas newsletter in your inbox each week.

*REQUIRED

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.

Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the mutual fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional, and should be read carefully before investing. Similar information about collective investment trusts can be obtained from Capital Group or participants' plan provider or employer.

All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.

Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.

American Funds Distributors, Inc., member FINRA.

This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.