Given the rapid acceptance of target date funds (TDFs) as the primary retirement investment strategy for American workers, the choice of target date provider is now among the most important decisions for an investment committee.
The beauty of a TDF is its simplicity for participants. However, its underlying complexity can challenge committees tasked with assessing a TDF’s glide path design, risk/return profile and fee structure as part of fiduciary due diligence.
One of the considerations is whether the TDF should be actively or passively managed. In either case, appropriate due diligence must be conducted. When selecting a TDF provider, sponsors should remember:
- Passive management does not provide fiduciary protection.
- Active management may lead to better participant outcomes.