Technology stocks lead continued market recovery

David Polak
Equity Investment Director

Mike Pollgreen
Investment Product Manager

Key takeaways

  • Global equities continued their rebound, led by technology-related companies.
  • Our growth funds continue to fare better against indexes than our growth-and-income funds.
  • In a narrow market, funds with an emphasis on growth and income have historically rewarded investors.

Two steps forward, one step back

Global equities posted a second consecutive quarter of strong gains following a pandemic-induced selloff earlier in the year. However, fears of additional COVID-19 outbreaks in the fall sent markets lower in September. Both developed and emerging markets rose, supported by massive government stimulus measures and investor optimism for a global economic recovery. 

U.S. equities produced the strongest returns across the major regions, with Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500) in positive territory (up 5.6% year to date) after entering and exiting its fastest ever bear market and correction earlier in the year. On a one-year basis, the major U.S., international, emerging markets, and global indexes had all turned positive — a fact that would have seemed outrageous in March.

Consumer-oriented technology companies, especially those based in the U.S., generated some of the largest gains relative to their size in global indexes, lifted by a surge in global online and  e-commerce activity. The information technology sector rally pushed some broad-based indexes to new all-time highs. Certain industrials and materials stocks also rallied amid a recovery in global demand, while most energy stocks fell sharply. The energy sector has fallen 42.4% year to date in the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) amid a true crisis of both supply and demand.

The U.S. Federal Reserve took no action on interest rates during the quarter, and the central bank revised its inflation stance to allow for longer periods of price increases before considering any rate increases. The global financials sector continued to trail the broad market during the quarter and remains down 22.4% year to date, second only to energy in the MSCI ACWI.

This year has been an incredibly challenging time for investors seeking income from dividend-paying companies. Unlike many past market downturns, large swaths of dividend payers have broadly lagged the market. In the MSCI ACWI, the year-to-date total return difference between the highest and lowest yielding quintile was more than 50% (-23.4% versus +27.4%).  

Against this backdrop, some of our equity funds strive by objective to pay income to shareholders.  Around the globe, this has made it difficult for some of those funds to outpace market-cap weighted benchmarks in the near to medium term. In fact, on a year-to-date basis, this distinction of whether or not a fund aims to generate income has correlated with its success in outpacing broad indexes.  Regardless of primary geographical focus, all of our growth funds have outpaced their primary benchmarks year to date, while conversely, all our growth-and-income funds have trailed them.  

Growth funds fare better than growth-and-income funds

Our U.S.-focused growth funds, The Growth Fund of America® (GFA) and AMCAP Fund®, outpaced the S&P 500 year to date. GFA outpaced the market in the third quarter as well, due in part to a larger position in consumer discretionary companies offering products that meet COVID-induced consumer demands, such as digital or contactless service. However, AMCAP trailed the S&P 500 in the third quarter due in part to having less exposure to cyclical sectors and industries than the index. Companies in these sectors benefited from stronger demand for cars and homes, despite weak overall consumer spending. The fund also held fewer technology holdings than the index, which held back returns, as did its investments in the biotechnology industry and energy sector.

All of our U.S.-focused funds that include income as an objective trailed the S&P 500 in both the third quarter and year to date in 2020. These growth-and-income funds included American Mutual Fund®, Fundamental Investors®, The Investment Company of America® and Washington Mutual Investors FundSM (WMIF). The reasons of course vary by fund, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that the income objective has been out of favor in this market environment. In the case of WMIF, the third-quarter drag on results came from such factors as not holding a meaningful amount of some of the top-returning technology companies, as well as stock selection in the health care sector. 

Outside of the U.S., the same trends hold true — each growth fund has outpaced its primary benchmark while each growth-and-income fund has trailed it. EuroPacific Growth Fund® has demonstrated strong results against its benchmark (MSCI ACWI ex USA) in both the third quarter, outpacing it by more than 340 basis points, and year to date, outpacing it by more than 980 basis points. In the third quarter, stock selection was the key driver, with positive contributions coming broadly across nearly every region and sector within the index. Companies within the energy and communication services sectors were the largest contributors. International Growth and Income FundSM, however, lagged in the quarter because of holding fewer consumer discretionary companies and certain European communications companies that have previously provided attractive dividends. 

Among our global funds, New Perspective Fund® (NPF) delivered strong excess returns in the third quarter, outpacing the index by more than 450 basis points. Year to date, NPF is 12.8% ahead of the MSCI ACWI. In the third quarter, the driver for excess returns was stock selection in the consumer discretionary sector; but most sectors provided positive stock selection, with certain health care companies playing an important role. By contrast, Capital World Growth and Income Fund® lagged in the third quarter in part because of its holdings in certain dividend-paying consumer staples and a lack of ownership in certain information technology companies.  

Finally, SMALLCAP World Fund® stands tall, with the fund’s results having outpaced the index on all common time frames. The magnitude is extreme in some cases, such as the one-year returns, where the fund is 22.3% ahead of the MSCI All Country World Small Cap Index. The success in the third quarter was owed largely to holding fewer financials and real estate firms and more consumer discretionary companies than the index.

Implications of a narrow market for diversified investors

A notable trend in the ongoing market recovery is the narrowness of equity index returns, with some of the largest U.S.-based technology and consumer-oriented companies providing major contributions to various index returns. This trend has meant that asset allocation has been a dominant driver of investors’ returns in recent years — the implications of the largest companies doing so well are dramatic on the relative outcomes of individual portfolios.  

For example, the six FAANGM stocks (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google and Microsoft) have played an outsized role on the S&P 500 Index:

  • They account for the five largest companies on the index.
  • They represent more than 23% of the index’s market weight.
  • They have accounted for 48% of the index’s gains in the last three years.

These all pose challenges for active managers, as keeping up has necessitated an embrace of market leadership that we believe may run counter to prudent portfolio management. Furthermore, some structural impediments exist. For example, at Capital Group our mutual funds are generally well diversified due to a combination of The Capital SystemSM (where multiple investment professionals independently manage portions of a strategy’s assets), internal strategy-specific guidelines and SEC requirements that limit exposure to individual companies, industries and regions.

While it paid to take concentrated risk in the U.S. over the last decade, the million-dollar question is, “Where will the next decade take us?” We don’t have a house view on that question. Some of our investors have drawn parallels to 1999, another point in time when growth stocks outpaced value stocks by such a wide margin. Others have countered that many of the largest companies today have steady earnings and are truly growing faster than the broad market. Additionally, the shuddered economy is not as strong as it was in 1999 and rates have been falling rather than rising.  

We do think it makes good sense for investors to maintain both diversification and flexibility in portfolios, and the dot-com bubble serves as a good reminder. For example, The Investment Company of America (ICA), which seeks to provide capital appreciation and income, has trailed the S&P 500 over the last 10 years. Over the last 50 years, the only other time where the fund’s 10-year return trailed the S&P 500 for more than several years was in the late 1990s. At that point in time, however, the results drag was even more pronounced, as the fund had trailed over the last 20 years for approximately two years.

The dot-com bubble eventually burst, and ICA provided downside resilience that led to meaningful excess returns of rolling 10-year results for the periods that lasted through March 2012. Over the entire 50-year stretch, the fund outpaced the S&P 500 in 70% of all available 10-year periods. The result has been 27% more wealth created for investors, and much of that value was created via downside resilience. A similar explanation could be provided for our other U.S.-oriented growth-and-income funds (American Mutual Fund, Fundamental Investors and WMIF), all of which outpaced the S&P 500 a majority of the time over rolling 10-year periods during this same time frame.* 

Will calmer waters prevail in turbulent times?

For investors, making sense of the recent turbulent period feels daunting. Our portfolio managers and analysts can relate, and there remain healthy discussion and debate within our investment groups on many issues, some of which we have already discussed:

  • How to prudently select dividend-payers for the downside resilience that they have historically provided.
  • The implications of the equity market’s narrowness for diversified investors.
  • How trends that have been accelerated by the pandemic have led to rapid redefining of many business models, leaving practically all industries up for grabs.

On this last point, the acceleration of companies redefining their industries’ business models has been a notable feature of returns across global equity markets this year. This is evident not only in platform companies but also in medical technology, biotechnology and even the automation of the mining industry. Mining companies are remotely operating autonomous machines from a central control room, and then collecting performance data to optimize future use of those machines. The companies that are able to create the most efficient processes through technology — whether they're the largest incumbents or not — stand to grow profit margins and take market share.

We believe that trying to link global macroeconomic events to recent market outcomes misses the bigger picture — that many industries today seem up for grabs, from biotechnology to mining, leading to plenty of attractive investment opportunities around the world for active managers.  

To say the 2020 investment environment has been challenging for active equity investors would be an understatement, but we remain resolute in our long-term focus, confident that some of the strongest businesses of tomorrow can be found and purchased at attractive prices today. In our view, the search for calmer waters in turbulent times must be done on an industry-by-industry and, more importantly, company-by-company level.

*Based on monthly rolling periods between 12/31/66 and 9/30/20 for American Mutual Fund (62%) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund (68%). Fundamental Investors (80%) uses its inception date of 7/31/78 for the start date.

Investment results and analysis

Mutual fund results (R-6)

Quarterly attribution reports (CITs and mutual funds)

All returns are for Class R-6 shares unless stated otherwise.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.

Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the mutual fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.

Figures shown are past results and are not predictive of results in future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and/or returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. View fund expense ratios and returns.

Investing outside the United States involves risks, such as currency fluctuations, periods of illiquidity and price volatility, as more fully described in the prospectus. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries. Small-company stocks entail additional risks, and they can fluctuate in price more than larger company stocks.

We offer a range of share classes designed to meet the needs of retirement plan sponsors and participants. The different share classes incorporate varying levels of advisor compensation and service provider payments. Because Class R-6 shares do not include any recordkeeping payments, expenses are lower and results are higher. Other share classes that include recordkeeping costs have higher expenses and lower results than Class R-6. 

Class R-6 shares were first offered on May 1, 2009. Class R-6 share results prior to the date of first sale are hypothetical based on the results of the original share class of the fund without a sales charge, adjusted for typical estimated expenses. Results for certain funds with an inception date after May 1, 2009, also include hypothetical returns because those funds’ Class R-6 shares sold after the funds’ date of first offering. Please see for more information on specific expense adjustments and the actual dates of first sale.

The market indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. There have been periods when the fund has lagged the index.

This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.

MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is designed to measure equity market results in the global developed and emerging markets, consisting of more than 40 developed and emerging market country indexes. 

MSCI All Country World Index ex USA (ACWI ex USA) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is designed to measure equity market results in the global developed and emerging markets, consisting of more than 40 developed and emerging market country indexes, excluding the United States. 

MSCI All Country World Small Cap Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market results of smaller capitalization companies in both developed and emerging markets. 

Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a market capitalization-weighted index based on the average weighted results of approximately 500 widely held common stocks.

MSCI has not approved, reviewed or produced this report, makes no express or implied warranties or representations and is not liable whatsoever for any data in the report. You may not redistribute the MSCI data or use it as a basis for other indices or investment products.

Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index (“Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2020 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.

American Funds Distributors, Inc., member FINRA.

Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.

© 2020 Capital Group. All rights reserved.