Trump’s Presidential Win May Not Be Bad for the Economy | Capital Group

Investment Insights

November 2016

Trump’s Presidential Win May Not Be Bad for the Economy

Darrell R. Spence Economist Los Angeles office 27 years of experience (as of 12/31/2019)

Despite some of the concerns voiced in the media in the run-up to the election, Donald Trump’s presidential win may not be bad for the economy.

The election’s net impact on the economy will be a function of the magnitude of policy changes and the timing of their implementation. With Republican control of all three branches of the federal government, some changes could happen quickly. Tax cuts would provide a fairly immediate boost to economic growth. A surge in infrastructure spending would also be beneficial but would take longer to be implemented, as projects need to be mapped out and resources mobilized.

If implemented as suggested in his plan, President-elect Donald Trump’s tax and infrastructure proposals could boost growth, all else being equal. This could lead to a meaningful uptick in the economy in late 2017. However, these policies would come at the price of a significant expansion in the deficit and a resumption of the upward trajectory in the federal debt-to-GDP ratio, which had started to flatten out.

To the extent this leads to increased concerns regarding the sustainability of U.S. debt, and the surge in growth creates inflationary pressures, these policies could lead to higher interest rates, offsetting some of the beneficial effects of lower taxes and higher spending. At the end of the day, the net impact on the annualized GDP growth rate could be a boost of 1.0% to 1.5%.

A reduction in the regulatory burden could also be implemented fairly quickly, with positive implications for growth.

Trade Agreements Take Years to Negotiate

Trade agreements take years to negotiate, so it is unclear what renegotiations of current trade agreements would entail and how quickly they would occur. Tariffs would have a fairly immediate negative effect on growth. Tariffs increase the price of imported goods for U.S. consumers, thus cannibalizing their purchasing power. In addition, tariffs could provoke trading partners to retaliate with similar measures, hurting U.S. exports.

Implementing a 35% tariff on imports from Mexico and a 45% tariff on imports from China, as Trump has suggested, would increase the cost of imported goods from those two countries by $310 billion. This would amount to 1.7% of GDP and 2.4% of consumer spending, so the economic impact would be meaningful.

In addition, a trade war has the potential to disrupt established supply chains. Trump’s trade measures are unlikely to result in a relocation of production to the U.S. Even if they did, it would take a long time for the U.S. to see the benefits, and it would mean much higher prices for those domestically produced goods.

The Possibility of Rising Geopolitical Uncertainty

If the U.S. takes a less active role in foreign affairs, global geopolitical uncertainty would increase, which would likely result in higher risk premiums. Ultimately, it seems that the outcome of the election is likely to create:

  1. Stronger growth in the near term, leading to a continued upward drift in inflation.
  2. Higher interest rates.
  3. A wider deficit/higher debt.
  4. An increase in risk premiums, including potentially lower P/E ratios, until there is more clarification on trade policy.

Looking farther out, if action on trade policy follows Trump’s rhetoric, the outcome is likely to be an unwelcome combination of slower growth and higher inflation, with a reasonable probability of a recession starting in 2018.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.

Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. 

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation. 

This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.