Capital Ideas

Investment insights from Capital Group

Regulation & Legislation
Are state-sponsored plans the future of retirement savings?
  • Recent legislation affects state-sponsored plans, but doesn’t end them.
  • State-sponsored retirement plans are growing: 37 states are considering them.
  • Our map shows whether employers would have a mandatory or voluntary option.

American workers rely on their employers’ plans for most of their retirement savings. There are plenty of challenges for retirement savings , but it’s far worse for the estimated 55 million U.S. workers — mostly in smaller businesses — who lack access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan.  According to an EBRI survey, about two-thirds of workers without a retirement plan have less than $1,000 in savings and investments.

To encourage higher retirement savings rates for this vulnerable population, many states have stepped in with IRA-type programs to encourage employers without retirement plans to offer one for their workers. Some state plans, like those in Illinois and California, require employers with a certain number of employees to make available a state-run plan — usually with a 3% minimum salary deduction, unless the employee opts out. Other states, like Washington and New Jersey, simply try to make it easier for small employers without retirement plans to offer one, by setting up retirement plan marketplaces of approved investment providers and, in some cases, tax incentives.

As of June 30, 2017, 10 states had enacted some form of state-sponsored plan, and 27 additional states were considering them. This map shows how each state is addressing this issue.


map of state-sponsored retirement plans in the U.S.

The challenge from Washington, D.C.

The federal government has broad authority over retirement plans under the Employer Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). States became involved when the federal government did not take action to address the coverage gap among smaller businesses. To encourage states that were designing programs of their own, the Obama administration exempted them from federal rules when they automatically enrolled individuals into an IRA. On May 3, the GOP-controlled Congress reversed those exemptions. As Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell stated, “[the states] didn’t like that the basic [ERISA] retirement protections that apply to those who manage private sector retirement plans would apply to the government too,” adding that federal protections shouldn’t be used to compel private-sector workers into government-run plans.

The pullback of ERISA protections potentially forces the state programs — especially the mandatory ones — to make sure they comply with the same requirements that private retirement plans face.

Oregon’s OregonSaves program, which launched July 1, is an example. Its three-year reporting requirement may have run afoul of ERISA rules. But instead of pulling back, the Oregon Treasury Department re-affirmed its commitment to the program: “Even with the passage of the resolution, we are continuing to work toward a successful launch of OregonSaves, on time, and in harmony with the legislation that established the program.”

It’s difficult to envision other states, having moved into the retirement plan space, taking a meaningful step back. “The fact that millions of working Americans don’t have access to a retirement plan at work means that this issue isn’t going away anytime soon,” says Capital Group’s ERISA attorney, Jason Bortz.

Most state-run plans remain in the planning stages.

The need for more retirement savings vehicles has put states in the driver’s seat for the first time. But the sudden rise of state-sponsored plans — something that didn’t exist even five years ago — generates uncertainty and questions:

  • What standards will be used in selecting investments for these plans?
  • What investment options will be available to participants?
  • Can participants receive investment advice?
  • Will the plan sponsor have any input on the plan design for maximum contributions and tax benefits?

The alternative to a state-sponsored plan

There are other retirement-plan options for small-business owners besides the programs offered by their state. Many traditional retirement plans were designed specifically to create a comfortable retirement for employees at a low cost with a minimum amount of employer involvement.

When choosing a plan, the help of a financial advisor can be crucial. State plans may offer a cheaper alternative, or they may impose an undue administrative burden. An advisor can help small business owners sort that out, so they can make the best choice for themselves and their employees.

Hear from the investment team.

Don't miss out

Get the Capital Ideas newsletter in your inbox each week


Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.

Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the mutual fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional, and should be read carefully before investing. Similar information about collective investment trusts can be obtained from Capital Group or participants' plan provider or employer.

All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.

Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.

American Funds Distributors, Inc., member FINRA.

This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.