The U.S. government is poised to throw a lifeline to financially troubled multiemployer pension plans. Tucked into the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package signed into law in March, is a special financial assistance program offering an estimated $86 billion of grants to struggling plans.
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is currently finalizing details of the assistance program, with additional guidance due to be published no later than mid-July. Therefore, the next few weeks offer a window for plan sponsors to consider key questions around program eligibility and potential implications for investment strategy.
Funded by the U.S. Treasury and administered principally by the PBGC, the program requires plans to segregate the aid they receive and invest it in investment-grade (BBB/Baa and above) bonds or other instruments that may be permitted by the forthcoming PBGC guidance. The program is designed to ensure that plan participants continue to receive any payments due to them roughly through 2051.
The flow of funds is anticipated to look something like this:
During this interim period between enactment of the legislation and publication of PBGC guidance, sponsors may find it helpful to consider their plans as falling generally within one of four buckets.
According to the legislation, plans must meet at least one of the following requirements to be eligible for special financial assistance:
In addition, the law says that in the first two years the PBGC may choose to give priority to some of the most hard-pressed plans seeking assistance — essentially moving them to the front of the line. Such plans must meet at least one of the following criteria:
The bucket into which a plan falls may impact investment decisions, although the strategic implications are challenging to ascertain with certainty while further guidance is pending.
One possibility, however, is that the legislation could create some form of moral hazard for plans in bucket 3. Here’s why. Plan sponsors are charged with managing plan assets to benefit plan participants, not the government or taxpayers. If the plan incorporates the knowledge of this new assistance program into strategic investment decision-making, then introducing significant incremental risk into the plan in the short term may actually be considered a rather prudent approach. (Whether or not this would be allowable and/or required is a legal question outside the scope of this article.) If the incremental risk-taking is punished by the capital markets, the plan may find that it has gained eligibility for special financial assistance, which in turn would benefit plan participants (at least with respect to benefit payments made before 2052). If, on the other hand, the additional risk-taking is rewarded with incremental returns, the plan may find itself better funded.
There are many other unknowns. The legislation allows the PBGC to regulate some activities of participating multiemployer plans, such as allocation of plan assets, but expressly forbids it from influencing other activities, such as “plan governance, including selection of, removal of, and terms of contracts with…investment managers... .” That raises the question of whether the PBGC will steer asset allocations in a certain direction. If so, might it depend on a plan’s allocation in place at the beginning of plan year 2021, or at the time that the legislation was enacted, or when the PBGC publishes its guidance, or when a plan applies for assistance?
What of the segregated assets? Will the program limit investment options to investment-grade (BBB/Baa and above) bonds? Will asset classes such as hybrids and private credit be allowed? Will there be mechanisms in place to disallow or disincentivize excessive risk-taking or pure yield-seeking within the technical boundaries of investment-grade? Will there be some expectation of cash flow or duration matching, or would plan sponsors want to do this on their own to ensure the plan can make benefit payments as promised? Will plan sponsors be encouraged to address “Climate-Related Financial Risk” in light of President Biden’s recent executive order of the same title?
The questions go on from there. In many cases, the sensible approach may be to wait and see what additional PBGC guidance may bring. But for certain unique situations, an odd blend of strategic incentives and risks (legal, reputational, financial, etc.) could manifest, such that pension decision-makers will require thoughtful deliberation within a tight time frame.
The new special assistance program for financially troubled multiemployer plans may provide critical assistance to help plans meet obligations to participants for the next 30 years. But plan sponsors may want to consider the program’s implications sooner rather than later. Capital Group’s LDI Solutions team is available as a resource for multiemployer plan sponsors as they think through these issues, and for other investors who are working through any potential implications for bond market technicals, asset prices and other considerations.
Bond ratings, which typically range from AAA/Aaa (highest) to D (lowest), are assigned by credit rating agencies such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's and/or Fitch, as an indication of an issuer's creditworthiness.
Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.
American Funds Distributors, Inc., member FINRA.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.