Asset allocation is one of the most important investment planning decisions.
The key question: What is the best mix between stocks and bonds, and how should that mix change over time? By focusing on diversification, however, we may lose an important distinction: Not all equities are created equal.
Different types of stocks exhibit unique risk and return characteristics that can help offset the changing risks investors face. Better outcomes can be achieved by harnessing these traits, rather than simply holding the broad equity market and adding more bonds.
Although the philosophy of different equities for different investors may have fallen out of style, it predates foundational concepts such as modern portfolio theory and the capital asset pricing model by at least 50 years. It is worth revisiting.
Although there are other ways to slice the market — by yield, by market capitalization, by valuation — we found that beta, a measure of a stock’s sensitivity to overall equity market risk, forms a relatively simple way to distinguish between growth and defensive companies.
Using more than five decades of historical data, we found that higher beta stocks were riskier and more volatile but offered higher returns than lower beta stocks. Which isn’t surprising. But a compelling new perspective is revealed by reconsidering how volatility is measured.
For investors with a shorter time horizon, such as those nearing retirement, defensive lower beta equities have delivered superior results in periods of market stress. This group has produced better downside protection and enhanced returns compared to a mixed stock/bond portfolio that just reduces its stock allocation in favor of bonds over time.
This is why we focus on income-oriented stocks in portfolios for investors nearing retirement. These have had a more conservative profile that helps reduce the risk of losses while at the same time keeping a healthy allocation to equities, which offer higher long-term returns compared to bonds.
Plotting the beta cohorts against their downside capture — a measure of how exposed they are to broad market pullbacks — draws out an important distinction. Traditional measures of risk weigh upside and downside outcomes equally, but sometimes losses hurt more.
Put simply, low-beta stocks demonstrated less downside and more upside than expected. Compared to simply holding the entire equity market, the most defensive Q1 (low beta) portfolio has yielded nearly the same average return for a more than 40% reduction in downside capture risk. Adding bonds to a portfolio could have lowered downside, but with far lower average returns.
For those with longer time horizons, such as young investors with the stomach to stay the course in the midst of selloffs, more cyclical, higher beta equities have yielded better outcomes. This is why we emphasize growth stocks in portfolios for investors early in the savings cycle.
To illustrate this point, we plotted the beta cohorts by their volatility over a long-term holding period of 20 years. Portfolios that held higher beta equities would have earned higher total returns, helping offset the chances of inadequate savings at retirement, at a lower level of long-term risk compared to simply increasing exposure to the broad market.
Although high beta stocks tended to lose more value during market downturns, they often bounced back — a reflection of their growth-oriented nature.
Sure, short-term market volatility can be emotional and worrisome for those invested in higher beta stocks. But for those with the discipline to remain invested during volatile stretches, these corrections and selloffs may be eclipsed by the market’s tendency to rise over multi-decade periods.
The mutual fund industry in the U.S. got its start by holding different kinds of equities to fulfill specific investment objectives. Retirees typically invested in funds of blue chip, dividend-paying companies, while others invested in funds seeking appreciation and high total returns.
The equity differentiation strategies outlined here have fallen out of favor in an era of passive investing, indexing and market efficiency. This is unfortunate, as the often singular focus on portfolio diversification has led many to forget that equity diversity can be a powerful risk reduction tool.
Investors face varied and changeable risks as they age. So why should their equity exposure — often simply an allocation to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index via a low-cost index product — remain the same? By viewing the stock market not as a homogeneous block but as a mix of individual issues with unique characteristics, better investment outcomes can be achieved.
Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index is a market capitalization-weighted index based on the results of approximately 500 widely held common stocks. This index is unmanaged, and its results include reinvested dividends and/or distributions but do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions, account fees, expenses or U.S. federal income taxes. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index (“Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2019 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.
Bond allocation in equity/bond mixed portfolios represented by five-year constant maturity U.S. Treasury notes.
Demographics & Culture
Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.
American Funds Distributors, Inc., member FINRA.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.