ARTICLES JANUARY 2020
The U.S. Federal Reserve confirmed market expectations that rate cuts are on pause for now. Among developed markets, the U.S. has become the exception in a world where negative rates are the strange new normal. Yet, negative yielding bonds are just one of the many odd consequences of aggressive monetary policy.
Imagine walking into a bank to open a savings account and learning that the bank will charge you interest on your deposits. That’s exactly what UBS is doing in Europe for balances exceeding 500,000 euros.
Imagine buying a home and your mortgage broker telling you that you can borrow more than you have to pay back. Borrowers in Demark are living this dream thanks to negative mortgage interest rates.
Just how negative have bond yields become? Swiss government bond yields are negative all the way out to 50-year maturities. A whopping 20% of European investment-grade corporate bonds are negative-yielding.
“In an extraordinary market like this, balance is essential,” says Mike Gitlin, head of fixed income at Capital Group. “Amid unusual market trends and mixed economic indicators, a strong core bond allocation is your best defence. It can help to absorb unexpected volatility in equity markets.”
“2019 saw both equity and fixed income markets generate remarkably strong returns for investors,” explains Pramod Atluri, portfolio manager. “Such strong returns for both asset classes are unusual given the backdrop of weaker global economic growth, lower earnings growth, elevated geopolitical uncertainty and trade tensions.”
Perhaps the biggest threat to global growth is China’s slowing economy. While ongoing trade policy jolts have contributed to some of the country’s troubles, other issues also plague its economy. Credit growth has weakened, unemployment is rising and wage growth is falling for lower skilled workers. Although the Chinese government’s official GDP growth estimate is 6% for the year, Capital Group economists think it could be weaker. If the world’s second-largest economy continues to stumble, the domino effect on other countries could be significant. Those that export goods to China will see slowing demand. Global commodity producers will also suffer with Chinese businesses requiring fewer resources than expected.
Outside of China, the broader global outlook is not bright. Europe and Japan are both struggling with lacklustre GDP growth around 1%. Economic indicators on both the business and consumer sides have seen downward trends since 2017.
Are prospects better in the U.S.? “Unemployment is hovering at the lowest levels in 50 years, and wage growth is finally picking up at around 3%. Consumer confidence is also relatively strong,” Gitlin says.
“But that’s only half the story,” he continues. “Businesses look more bearish. Profit margins are declining as companies deal with those rising wages and higher costs of commerce due to tariffs. Manufacturing activity has contracted for four straight months, with fewer new orders and slower production. The U.S. has become a tale of two economies. Either the consumer will continue to carry growth or bearish businesses will push the U.S. toward recession.”
Given heightened policy uncertainty and slower growth, central bankers are unlikely to reverse course on their stimulus measures anytime soon. U.S. interest rates, which were thought to be on an upward trend as recently as late 2018, have declined. They are now expected to remain lower for even longer.
“The U.S. Federal Reserve’s own estimates indicate that its policy rate isn’t likely to exceed 2.5% through at least 2022,” says Margaret Steinbach, a fixed income investment director at Capital Group. “Bond investors see yields remaining very low for years to come — futures markets predict the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield to stay below 2.25% through 2024.”
Policy rates are near or below zero in most developed markets. Central bank balance sheets never shrank meaningfully and remain bloated post-crisis. That leaves monetary policymakers with less ammo to battle the next downturn.
“If central banks can’t resuscitate global growth, it may be fiscal policy’s turn to lend a hand,” Gitlin says. U.S. Fed Chair Jerome Powell suggested this last month. He urged U.S. lawmakers to get the nation’s finances in order so that the federal budget will have more leeway to provide stimulus when needed. Central bankers in other developed economies have made similar pleas for fiscal measures to pick up the slack. In fact, earlier this month Japan announced a new fiscal stimulus.
Asset prices have been perhaps the biggest beneficiary of aggressive monetary policy intervention. Equity markets have flourished in recent years. But that’s just one example. Bonds, real estate and most major asset classes are at the high end of their 15-year valuation range.
Credit has become expensive relative to history and given the macro risks. In late 2019, credit spreads for both investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds were hovering within or just above their richest quartile over the past 20 years.
When within this richest quartile, portfolios have historically earned an annualized 200 to 300 basis points more owning U.S. Treasuries instead of credit in the two years that followed. “We should expect to see more modest returns for investment-grade and high-yield bonds in 2020 than what we saw in 2019,” Atluri explains.
“The best way to balance a portfolio in uncertain times is to build a strong core bond allocation,” Gitlin says. “What does that mean? It means holding bonds that will provide not only income, but the other roles of fixed income as well: diversification from equities, capital preservation and inflation protection. That way, no matter what the market environment, fixed income should help portfolio resilience through the balance it can provide.”
Consider what happened during the six equity correction periods of 10% or more since 2010. In each of these periods, core funds persevered.
“Of course, some investors may need more tailored fixed income options that go beyond a core bond allocation to stress one role of bonds more than the other three,” he adds. “In those cases, more targeted strategies can be sprinkled in.”
Government securities can help investors looking for more diversification from equities. Canadian Core Plus Fixed Income’s largest allocation is to government securities as of November 30, 2019. The portfolio focuses on government securities as it seeks steady income and capital preservation.
Based on specific investor needs, a portfolio should remain reasonably balanced. A strong core fixed income foundation may help portfolios achieve that balance.
High-yield corporate bonds have recently been a go-to source for investors looking for more income. However, as the sector has seen strong inflows and loftier valuations, its returns are likely to moderate. Credit spreads are tight in this late phase of the economic cycle. In this environment, high-yield bonds are asymmetrically susceptible to losses, suggesting those looking for enhanced income should think more broadly.
Emerging markets debt has provided similar levels of income but a lower correlation to equities. That means its returns or losses have historically not been as closely linked to those of stocks. Emerging Markets Total Opportunities takes a lower volatility approach to emerging markets by investing in stocks and bonds with a well-defined process for managing volatility.
For investors, the trade-off of emerging markets debt comes in the shape of greater potential volatility due to currency and interest rate movements. And — as underscored by Argentina’s recent change of government — political, fiscal and monetary policies can move quickly. However, this episode also demonstrates that emerging markets are idiosyncratic, as Argentina's problems were largely isolated. The sector offers a wide array of investment opportunities. One country’s troubles won’t necessarily lead to contagion for the entire sector. A research-driven approach focusing on country fundamentals is, therefore, crucial.
“Through prudent investing, emerging markets debt, in our view, offers a relatively high level of compensation for the risks entailed,” Steinbach says.
Portfolios should look for balance and include fixed income to provide balance. A strong core bond allocation that provides all four roles of fixed income can help achieve better long-term outcomes. Our World Bond mandate takes a prudent approach to global diversification by investing primarily in sovereign and corporate bonds in both developed and developing markets.
Pramod Atluri is a fixed income portfolio manager at Capital Group. He holds an MBA from Harvard and a bachelor's in biological chemistry from the University of Chicago. Pramod is also a CFA charterholder.
Mike Gitlin is head of fixed income at Capital Group. He has 25 years of investment experience. Before joining Capital in 2015, Mike was head of fixed income and global head of trading for T. Rowe Price. He holds a bachelor's from Colgate University.
Margaret Steinbach is a fixed income investment director at Capital Group. She has 13 years of investment industry experience, four with Capital. Previously, Margaret worked as a portfolio specialist at Oaktree Capital Management. She holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from the University of Virginia.